Jack Ramirez

Devil's Advocacy Group Inc. | #MAGA |
Professional Grade Space Ranger | Diagnosed Stage 4 Cancer |
18+, No minors.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@PureKoor Keeping people away from a cult by enforcing uniformity of thought. 👍

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Babyfurs disgust me on a totally different level. They sexually fantasize toddlers, broadcast it in public as part of their fetish, and then deny being pedophilic creepers. And they combine this foul display with their piss & shit fetish.
I can't "accept" them, nor can I affirm their vile mental condition.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Problem is, the theory doesn't explain how it happens. We have little understanding behind how error-correction occurs in the genomic code of life. In every programming language we know, random changes in the code very quickly destroys the entire system. Just look at the recent Crowdstrike crisis. Less than a dozen lines of error code brought the IT world to its knees.
We have no idea why that doesn't occur in earth biology, but it's rapidly looking like all that "junk DNA" actually serves a valuable task.
I'd agree with you on the subject of religion though. What is time to a God that transcends our three dimensional perspective, or even to the universe itself, wherein spacetime exists as a holographic protection from a two dimensional plane that contours around mass? It appears the only reason we perceive three dimensions and time itself is because it allows for enough perceptive error-correction to significantly increase the likelihood of survival. Keeping in mind, perception has evolved to reduce complexity to increase fitness and survival, not necessarily to perceive actual truth.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@stavro_27 @darwintojesus No, it's still theory. You're confusing adaptation with evolution.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@Truth_Dragon500 Early 2000's goth-vampire music; basically the entire album for the film "Queen of the Damned".

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

The aliens know what they want, ms that's an endless tide of Family Feud.

[Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives @dom_lucre]

🔥🚨HAPPENING NOW: Atlanta residents are puzzled by a light projection in the sky that depicts comedian Steve Harvey.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Hypothetically, what if a man transitions to a trans-woman all the way, and then decides to transition back to man. If they have to go through the same treatments as a trans-man, would that qualify?
Or would that make them a meta-man, or some other next generation term for double transition? 🤔

[Clandestine @WarClandestine]

The year is 2025.

Donald Trump is your President, the border is secure, WW3 has been cancelled, and the economy is recovering.

RFK Jr. is the head of a 3-letter agency, cleansing our government, tackling the health crisis, and enacting the Covid reckoning.

Elon Musk is an advisor to Trump, and leading the Government Efficiency Task Force, helping to trim the fat, drain the swamp, and using his expertise in manufacturing, energy, transportation, space, information, etc., to help return the US to her greatness.

Vivek Ramaswamy is serving as a top diplomat and valuable asset to the Trump administration, using his experience with Pharma and Deep State corruption to assist Trump in his retribution, and carry on the future of the MAGA movement.

General Mike Flynn is serving as a top intelligence director, where he has the tools to hunt Deep State actors, and reveal where the bodies are buried.

This is what awaits us if we are victorious in November.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@YasuFluffBall It's more in reference to the DNC kid, but I guess it's applicable just about everywhere.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Using children for political pandering is pathetic.

Lemme run a commercial full of sick puppies being tossed into a woodchipper to the song "In the Arms of an Angel" with a big bold text overlay saying "voting for blah blah sends puppies to their death".

Just go 100% shameless with the emotional manipulation, and if you say anything about it, I'll just reply that you're a piece of shit for hating puppies.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@toriel1one1 There's no way that guy is legit. That has to be bait. I just can't believe it.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@Leon_SpottyDog @DiezelRaccoon Having to sling insults at me says more about you than it does me. I hope you learn to overcome that. Until then, best of luck and I hope you have a better day.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Honestly, this might be my favorite version of the batmobile. The scene where he chased the Penguin through Gotham was so bad ass and on theme for Batman's personality and character.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

The topic is still up for debate, with many sports banning trans participation. The appeal to the expert is another fallacious argument; despite their knowledge, their opinions aren't statements of fact by declaration alone. Otherwise, medical experts would still be performing lobotomies.
I don't think you're as open minded as you declared yourself at the beginning of this thread either.

Can't say that I'm all that mad about any of this conversation either. I'm a KU chemistry grad; my knowledge on this subject approaches expert by definition. I just don't swing my credential dick around in arguments because it's improper debate form, as I explained above. This all stemmed from my demonstration of an example of how fallacious statements are made on the basis of biased ideology to sow hate and division.
I apologize if I've frustrated or offended you, I simply prefer to decide my mind based on objective, measurable facts absent errors of logic. Not everybody fully graphs those rules, and even fewer take the right courses to learn them.

Here's a layman's guide you can get started with though. Best of luck.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@Leon_SpottyDog @DiezelRaccoon And you're still leaving it wide open for interpretation. We can compare all day long, but without stating how different records must be to cross the threshold, AND why you've picked that threshold, it's completely arbitrary.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

You don't seem to understand that your definition of "overwhelming" is arbitrary. You've said nothing to how it could be measured, whether it's by win percentage, degrees of victory over competition, etc.
Your second point is a slippery slope, opening up arguments about whether gender matters at all or if PEDs could be valid under the same premise.

Ultimately, we've gone far from the original topic, which was in how arbitrarily labeling people based on ideological rules is fallacious and ethically wrong.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

What's stopping you from using chopsticks to eat spaghetti and meatballs?

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@Leon_SpottyDog @DiezelRaccoon You're just kicking the can down the road. What constitutes "overwhelmingly winning or over achieving"?
Swimming experts would agree that Lia's records and the full second she had over 2nd place represents "overwhelming".

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

How would you define "domination" firstly?

Lia Thomas holds ivy league records and at the highest levels of competition, blown away her peers by more than a second (which is huge in swimming) in some events.

Problem we have here is that nobody will agree on what constitutes "domination" based on the agenda they're pushing. Thus making it arbitrary.

Instead we can only operate from objective truths, such as mechanical advantages provided by bone structures, reaction speed advantages conferred by fast twitch muscle fiber cells, oxygen intake capacity of the lungs, the efficiency of the circulatory system to transport the oxygen, as well as transporting or neutralizing lactic acid in the muscles, the blood cell types and quanties designed to more efficiently move various chemicals throughout the body, etc.

These standards can be measured and the data will remain unaffected by bias, because it is simply objective chemical and biological reality.

Sporting regulations didn't stop Fallon Fox from cracking Tamikka Brent's skull. How do you establish regulations without data? You're caught in a circular trap.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

By what reason are you setting this standard, because I think that's arbitrary. You could have several biological advantages over me and still lose.
You've also failed to establish why it would be fair to test whether or not trans-women should compete by allowing them to compete. If you're wrong, you've violated the fairness of competition for all the women that had to participate, and in physical sports such as wrestling, that can be wildly dangerous.

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

The evidence is in the cellular structures. You can hormone treatment as much as you like, but these cells do not change their types as a result. The only means we have in doing such a thing today is via transplant.
This isn't hypothetical, it is the truth of every trans-woman alive today. Their bones don't change shape, their lungs don't shrink, the circulatory system doesn't restrict itself, the gray matter density doesn't change, nor do the neurons, their types or quantities change, etc.

And further, if hormone treatment were like this mythical gender change potion you seem to think it might be, by what standard would we claim fairness to arrive at? How much medical harm must we establish to the male biology to level the playing field and is it a fair standard for every participant?

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

@Leon_SpottyDog @DiezelRaccoon And if you think they should participate in those events, why wouldn't it be appropriate for me to make the statement that you hate trans-women because you believe they should be forced to participate in events where they'd be unfairly disadvantaged?

[Jack Ramirez @foxette_ramirez]

Why is domination the bar for what's regarded as fair? Simply the establishment of differing biological structures is enough to proof to state it may not be appropriate for trans-women to participate in women's sports.
For example, what if transition actually confers a disadvantage for trans-women? Is it fair for them to participate in events where they will struggle to compete?