Murray Rothbard II

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

Keep this in mind always: They hate that you can say what you want on this platform. That's why they hate @elonmusk. Because they hate you.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

“Expensive groceries were a problem under Dems but not Republicans”
is the most retarded sycophantic lunacy anyone has tried to sell

It isn’t even a propaganda narrative, I could respect that

It’s a delusional signal of internecine conflict that will have disastrous effects

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@JoelWBerry Try telling people you ordered a $50 pizza. I'm a nobody and this somehow sparked more outrage than Signal Gate.

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@ConceptualJames @grok are grocery prices higher now than 5 years ago?

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

I ordered an X-large Supreme pizza last night and it cost $50. Not for delivery. Not with anything else. For the pizza. $50. If I went to the store and ordered all the ingredients for that pizza (toppings, sauce, dough), I could imagine it getting pretty close to $50.

[Joel Berry @JoelWBerry]

Last night, my wife made homemade burritos for our family of 8 and it cost less than $20 total for everyone.

Im beginning to think the affordability crisis is really an “I don’t know how to cook” crisis

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@ConceptualJames It was actually a good pizza and I can afford it. I'm not upset personally about it. Yes, I understand I could get a $20 crap 20"pizza from Papa John's. Or spend roughly $35-40 and find good ingredients and make it myself. But the point stands.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

I recently watched the Tommy Robinson debate at the Oxford Union and can't help but feel like it simply exposes how exhausted "debating" has become in the West.

For so long, we have thought the liberal framework of rational discussion, parliamentary-style debate, and free speech would solve every disagreement, and that anything which operates outside these parameters constitutes an illegitimate criminal act of violence.

The Nazis pouring across the border into Poland or the Russians invading Ukraine are explicit examples of this. Both operate outside the liberal democratic framework in a very explicit way. They're acts of warfare. When someone is shooting at you, it's easy to conclude that the normal rules no longer apply and you aren't going to "debate" your way out of this one, so you pick up arms and fight back.

But what if Putin had simply sent millions of pregnant women across the border into Ukraine rather than tanks? What if Hitler had battery-farmed Germans for a generation and then sent them freely into Poland to acquire citizenship and voting rights, in order to peacefully and democratically vote to annex the country into the Reich?

Is it a criminal act to abolish a people by force of arms, but "just politics" to use freedom of movement, birthright citizenship, and open borders to do the same? Because that's literally what the Green Party in the UK and the DSA in America are advocating for.

They want totally open borders, free movement of people, amnesty for anyone in the country illegally, and for anyone who enters the country to be granted all the rights of citizenship as anyone else whose families have lived there for centuries.

But what happens when you mass-import people into the West who do not agree with the liberal framework and who see liberalism as a uniquely Western value rather than a universal one? Who intend to substitute what they see as a foreign metaphysics for one of their own once they have the means to do so?

Does anyone honestly believe Oxford Union debates will be permitted about the dangers of Islam if Islam itself ever became a majority faith in the UK?

The answer is obviously no, so what's the point of debating with a group of people who will abolish the very concepts of open debate the moment they have the majority numbers to do so and who are trying to achieve by demographic means the same sort of conquest that historically has been undertaken by force of arms?

[Helen Andrews @herandrews]

The crimes of race communism did not start in 2020. If you wanted to calculate how much blood it has on its hands, you’d have to start with the victims in this graph. Or did you think the post-Sixties crime wave just happened?

(I agree with much of the rest of his thread.)

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@DiinamicMAGA @ConceptualJames I didn't say I couldn't get it elsewhere. And yes, I understand you can get cheap pizza. I'm making the point that a good X-large 20" pizza is going for around $40-50 now.

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@M651997 @ConceptualJames That's a 16" - I ordered a 20"

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

This is great - https://t.co/gBdBCs4ofA

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

I just ran a comparison with Grok for my area - closest comparable sized Supreme pizza is the 18" from Jet's Pizza and it's $43. So it's not just the place I ordered from.

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

Man, some of you got really upset by this. Seriously? Here's the breakdown for purchasing the ingredients. High end is $45. Remember, I said it was an X-large Supreme...

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

I'll never forget.

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.
NEVER FORGET.

[Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson]

Everybody knows the deserts are expanding.

Everybody knows that climate change threatens our food supplies.

LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES.

The planet is greener, by an area 3x that of the Amazon. The Sahara is shrinking fast. Crops are thriving like never before.

Enough Net Zero posturing. Enough demoralizing the young.

To hell with the false prophets of environmental doom.

https://t.co/bafnpMhWyT

[Helen Andrews @herandrews]

The racial hysteria of 2020 didn’t come out of nowhere. Two trends have been building for decades to force American race relations to a crossroads. We can choose a different path, or we will end up with permanent 2020 by default. https://t.co/RM5fYeE5S1

[The American Tribune @TAmTrib]

Another great article by Helen, but she once again falls short of the mandatory solution.

It's possible that it's because as she herself might say, she's a woman and still has the sensitivities of her sex, which is why she's uncomfortable with taking the maximalist stance.

It's also possible that she's still trapped in the frame of liberalism, as many on Right still are, where all solutions have to be moderated through the rule of law and the Constitution (a hindrance our enemies don't make the mistake of giving credence to).

The only decision that will actually solve this issue is a total reversal of everything that has come since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and aggressive industrial scale remigration, anything short will just reset the timer on the same outcome.

As Christopher Caldwell lays out in his book, The Age of Entitlement, the CRA replaced the Constitution and made illegal the baseline Right of Association. The entire system Helen is decrying was born and exists because of the legal precedent set by the CRA (and the scrapping of the actual American Constitution)

Everything that followed, from Hart-Celler in 1965, to the Immigration Act of 1990, to affirmative action and DEI, to NGO's facilitating massive migrant caravans, all have the CRA as their ideological bedrock. We cannot allow the poisonous tree to continue spreading its fruit.

If we are to continue as a country, we need to unequivocally outline the preconditions for being an American, and we cannot shy away from the ethnic component. Otherwise, as Helen says, we will be demographically replaced and the preferential racial laws already in place will be used against us. If you want to see what this looks like just look at Zimbabwe or South Africa.

American Whites must not be sheepish about our Rights and our ability to rule in the country created by our ancestors for us. We've had 3 generations to see what sharing power gets us, and the result is disgustingly clear. It would be madness to repeat the same mistake again.

When the pretext of sharing power with our enemies ends, we can't be shy about eradicating the legal framework used to oppress us in our own homeland.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

We’re starting to see Democrats openly declare that everything they were saying between 2018 and 2023 is now out of bounds for criticism, like it was all one giant oopsie that they get to erase from the public’s collective consciousness.

These people showed us their true colors at a time when they believed they had permanently won. They acted the way they did because they thought they could get away with it.

They never expected any backlash, and now that one has arrived, they want to pretend like they didn’t actually mean it when they said they hated Whites, hated men, hated this country, hated Western Civilization, and wanted to “decolonize” it all for the sake of their oikophobic ideology.

No, you don’t get a pass. When someone shows us who they are, believe them.

[Logan Hall @loganclarkhall]

Something has to change and telling young men that the country their ancestors built is just an idea while it’s being carved up piece by piece for every other ethnic group on the planet isn’t going to cut it.

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@ReburiedO @hwinkler4real Do you think the majority of people on the street have a food access problem?

[Murray Rothbard II @foxyrory]

@ReburiedO @hwinkler4real You know it's really easy to frame a non-problem in a way that makes it seem easy to solve and avoid any messy conversations about the real problem?