Whistleblowers and other govt insiders cannot speak publicly about potential aliens (unidentified anomalous phenomena) because their jobs would be put at risk.
This could all be changed by President Trump. With an executive order he could provide immunity and allow these insiders to come forward and speak.
We deserve to know the truth about whether the US govt has proof of life from other planets. Are we alone? President Trump can answer that question with his executive authority.
@GarryPNolan@UAPLuigi So glad you are on the council Garry. Even more glad you recognize B.S. in all its forms(even the potential intelligence community professional type), and stand up for the truth and honest inquiry no matter where it leads us.
@BitPaine Bit, if you boil it down, there are a number of trad fi people who purposefully want MSTR to fail(even if BTC succeeds). They are having their moment to try and hold MSTR down until it drowns(stays permanently <1.0 mNAV). Only time will tell.
@nickgiva1@JoeCarlasare Nick, how would you define the successful completed “purge” of DATs? Serious question. Want to know what that end state looks like.
@ActuallyClimber@JoshMandell6@clinkie44@chooserich I've heard Josh say that he hopes that MSTR will eventually get on the right track and then join the S&P 500, thereby giving more people exposure to Bitcoin. I think that is Josh's deeper goal.
Fuck it. I’m selling literally everything.
Sitting and doing absolutely nothing until October 5th, then 100% allocating to Bitcoin at the cycle low.
Then sitting and doing absolutely nothing until Sept 3, 2029, then selling 100% of it at the cycle high.
Piece of cake.
Josh, it’s shocking to me that at this point in the evolution of MSTR as a company that they don’t have the right people in the room making the decisions regarding these financial products. You would think after they got to a certain size that a financial partner of theirs would force them into the correct behaviors, but maybe not, I don’t know that world. It just seems stupendously silly to continue to make decisions that seem counter to what the marketplace is looking for. At some point Mike, you gotta let somebody else take the wheel.
they’re not jobs if they’re not valued. they’re not valued if there aren’t customers out there willing to pay them for their great work. needing the government to “create” a job is tantamount to welfare and that level of welfare resolves these individuals to a dependency on the government and lack of economic mobility. and chains our people, collectively, to a more indentured future.
you may be well intentioned but you have, and always will, fail to see the destitute folly of government as a job creation engine.
i have tried to engage you on this topic, in good faith, with empiricism and reasoning, but you have only dodged my points and pivoted to some populist refrain about the importance of taxation and the evils of productivity-driven success.
i can only assume you’re dodging these truths because you and the rest of the politburo leadership have deemed the conversation unsafe speech and put your oligopoly at risk.
let’s leave it at that then.
perhaps if your ways get their day, we can all bask in the glories of the dark ages ahead.