Sometimes I pause and reflect on the fact that my entire financial portfolio is currently composed of 1) an imaginary Internet ponzi coin and 2) the stock of a company famous for having the largest peak-to-trough drawdown in the history of financial market bubbles, and whose CEO is currently leveraged to the tits on the same Internet Ponzi coin (which he refers to as “the goddess of truth”), and that I consider this a sound financial strategy with a virtually 100% chance of retiring my bloodline.
messaging my wife a link containing proof of her husband cheating on her from an anonymous instagram account and then when she clicks on it texting her to let her know she failed the family phishing test and she has to retake my cybersecurity course
Her entire religious muslim hijabi thing happened way later in her life.
And l will bet money she only changed up to score oppression points in politics and appeal to jihadi constituents.
You will not see Bitcoin under $65k again.
4 months ago, Bitcoin bottomed at $58k before rising and settling in a range between $78k - 86k.
During this time, every 10 minutes, a new Bitcoin block has been created and Bitcoin's power law floor has continued to rise.
As of today, that floor has risen to $66.5k.
By the end of 2026, this floor will be over $70k.
Bitcoins current price of $80,600 sits 57% below the power law green linear line.
To catch the linear line up and be in a similar trajectory as we were in August 2025, Bitcoin needs to see a 132% move to the upside.
We still have a huge amount of catching up to do.
$80k for one Bitcoin is quite frankly a joke & a huge buying opportunity for those with conviction.
By May 2027, the power law floor will have surpassed $80k.
Buying here is like buying at $20k in October 2022.
Don't fade it.
NEW - Adolf Hitler's Alpine retreat, the Eagle's Nest, was completely destroyed after a potential arson attack last night in Bavaria's Berchtesgaden, Germany.
yeah… it’s called the expansion of space, the discovery of which - and that this expansion is accelerating - are two of the foundational discoveries of modern astronomy / astrophysics
the former was discovered by Edwin Hubble almost 100 years ago, and proven by the studying the relationship (Hubble-Lemaître law) between distance and velocity of galaxies
the latter was discovered by Perlmutter, Schmidt, and Riess about thirty years ago, and they won the Nobel prize in 2011
so it’s only a conundrum if you are in fact a retarded retard who has decided you are going to reject 101-level understanding of the subject and speculate based on your own retarded heuristics
We are told that the Big Bang was 13.8 billion years ago. And so theoretically, 2 photons (the fastest "particles") traveling in opposite directions from the Big Bang could now only be 27.6 billion light-years apart. And yet we are also told that the observable universe is 93 billion light-years across. This creates a conflict.
When I have asked physicists about this conflict, they reply that in the first moments right after the Big Bang, the rules of physics were different, allowing matter to travel faster than light speed, and thereby spreading out the universe to a greater extent than should be possible under the current rules of physics as we know them. This seems like a case of bending the rules to fit the theory as opposed to fitting the observations.
My conclusion is that we still have a few things yet to figure out.
Dünya penis boyu haritası açıklandı!
Küresel veri tabanlarının derlediği araştırmaya göre, dünya genelinde erkeklerin erekte haldeki ortalama penis boyu 13.58 cm olarak belirlendi.
Sıralamada öne çıkan ülkeler:
Ekvador: 17.61 cm
Kamerun: 16.67 cm
Hollanda: 15.87 cm
Almanya: 14.52 cm
Türkiye: 12.99 cm
Çin: 12.90 cm
Japonya: 12.60 cm
Filipinler: 10.85 cm
Güney Kore: 10.80 cm
Kamboçya: 9.84 cm
Tayland: 9.43 cm
Uzmanlar coğrafi farklılıkların genetik etkenlere bağlı olduğunu, ancak bu ortalamaların cinsel sağlık veya işlevsellik üzerinde doğrudan bir üstünlük kurmadığını belirtiyor.
It's subtle, but with a trained eye, you can detect a slight difference between the way that The New York Times Editorial Board is treating the accusations against Ilhan Nur Said Elmi (aka Ilhan Omar) and the way they treated the accusations against Donald Trump.
The New York Times’ position is basically, “yes we may have said ‘no one is above the law’ before, but obviously of course some people are above the law if they agree with our political ideology, and any efforts to hold anyone with our ideology accountable is a heckin fascism”