"Calculus over statistics." says, Horowitz
Decision making is chaotic, and though the stat might read 80% of the time if you do X we'll fail, it's important to understand specific dynamics about your company. Stats are useful..until they're not.
Really enjoying this book!
I’m excited to introduce Clark, the first AI Agent to build internal enterprise apps.
We’ve raised $60M, including a fresh $23M from @sparkcapital@kleinerperkins, @MeritechCapital and Greenoaks.
Unlike consumer vibe coding tools like Lovable, Replit and Bolt that only generate prototypes, Clark builds production-ready internal apps — enforcing your enterprise standards:
🧩 UIs generated using your design system
🔌 Integrations with private APIs, databases and SaaS apps
🔐 Permissions mapped to @okta & @azuread groups
🛡️ Security with audit logging, secrets management, and vulnerability scans
Clark is designed to operate exactly like a human internal tools team. It's built on a state-of-the-art multi-agent architecture, emulating your Designer, IT admin, Engineer, Security Operations, and QA employees.
When Clark generates an application, you can modify it in 3 ways:
1. Natural language - talk to Clark
2. Visual – Edit it like in Figma
3. Code – Use your IDE like Cursor or VSCode
Global enterprises in regulated industries like @Instacart (CART), @carrier (CARR), and @cvent (Blackstone) already run their mission-critical apps on our platform.
Our customers save $5m on average. Book a demo and we'll save you $5m too. And we're so confident that if we can't, we'll donate $5,000 to a charity of your choice:
Book a Demo – https://t.co/oG5LaD10V9
---------
As part of this launch, we’re giving away the system prompts of leading AI products like Cursor, Manus, and Codex.
These 6,000 line system prompts have enabled them to become billion-dollar companies on top of foundation models.
Retweet this post and comment ‘Superblocks’ below, and we'll send you the link so you can engineer world class prompts yourself.
👇 See Clark in action in the thread below
without big media putting an asterisk on the final.
STAT LINE: There has been 100 fouls called for against Iowa’s opponents during the tournament vs 63 against Iowa for a 7.4 per game difference, equating to more shooting 46 more free throws equaling 9.2 more points per game.
The Caitlyn Clark effect is probably no difference than the NCAA wanting a Power 5 team with alumni money to make a deep run on the men’s side. We’ve seen the bias year over year, but continue to pay to watch anyway.
South Carolina is a 6.5 pt favorite, but Iowa has been gifted a (9.2 point) cushion via fouls resulting in free throws during the tournament. In what I hope is a thriller, I’m hoping to watch the greatest college scorer ever try to knock off the undefeated for a national title
@AmandaSains Pretty solid, but lose the stickiness (2/year life span) photo quality is good just depends on the purpose you want them for. I saw the other reply. Framebridge has been great.