@HatedbyU2@TheShadowIntelX@TuckerCarlson Poor wittle you, whining about Tucker not meeting your particular definition of perfect, which maybe one person in a million actually share.
@politicaleconZA@TheShadowIntelX What a dumb statement. Larry Johnson was once CIA, you claiming he's also an operative? If your dad once worked for the FBI, does that mean you are an FBI operative. Use some common sense.
@Dlembry93@TheShadowIntelX No they didn't vote for that. They were betrayed by the Epstein class, the Banker cartel, sadly, that's the rule, not the exception, no matter who you vote for.
@OG3OG43@TheShadowIntelX Nothing wrong with MAGA, dumbass. A US populist - nationalist movement. The right thing. That it has been partly hijacked and betrayed by the Epstein Class who have infiltrated all levels of political & economic power in the US and many other nations, is par for the course.
@BipulTweets If Trump used his f'in brains he would just put up & shut up for another 3-6 months until the Trudeau/Carney globalist miscreants are thrown out of office and conservative Pierre Poilievre is elected PM. Now the Libs are using Trump tariffs as their election strategy.
@Artemisfornow That idiot doesn't know the first thing about climate change science or climate change mitigation or rational energy policy. A total energy imbecile. A disgrace.
@avandyc@macnahgalla https://t.co/rmgmN7sBRd
10X more concrete, 10X more steel, 300X more copper per twh generated wind over nuclear, and more. That is beyond the world economies ability to deliver, replacing fossil. Forget it, can't be done. Sorry.
@wnyconservative@macnahgalla No it ain't. That's fundamental. It's called full lifecycle analysis and it determines whether an energy source is viable.
@Islebaylimited@macnahgalla What byproduct is that? Lower radioisotopes, by far. Lower waste by far. Lower heavy metals by far. In fact lower in all wastes by far. One rare Earth mine that makes wind turbine magnets would power the entire Earth, all energy, with the radioactive waste from the mine.
@the_LoungeFly@macnahgalla And you need all of that in order for wind power to even exist. Wind doesn't replace fossil/nuclear/hydro, it just shifts the points at which they are injected into the economy. A physically impossible replacement for realistic fossil/nuclear/hydro. Those are the facts.
@avandyc@macnahgalla ~10X less for a giant PWR. An MSR likely more like >40X less. That's in an apples (nuclear) to rotten oranges(wind) comparison. Reliable vs unreliable, intermittent vs 24/7, 365 days/yr power.
@thenumberoneduk@macnahgalla@rodjo1 Indeed spurious. The massive land area requirements is just a small part of wind problems. Intermittency, low reliability, seasonal variation, geographic limitations, vast material inputs, induced grid inefficiencies, long distance 3X oversized transmission... more.
@Gloster80256@macnahgalla@amackenziesmith Not many instances. A few. Satellites, on diesel grids in good wind/solar locations or where there is ample reservoir hydro. Otherwise pretty much useless. A bit player, always will be. Inescapable, sorry.