People demanding "proof" of election fraud are not understanding how crime works. I worked at Manhattan DA for over 2 years, one in Homicide. We never had video proof of the crime. We almost never had DNA. These are things that occur on CSI on TV, not in real life. And we still convicted people all the time.
What we had was testimony and circumstantial evidence. Travel times, bank records, cell phone data, gate access codes. Motive, capability, benefit, time and place. Never direct proof. Of course the defendant always denied the crime, but there was enough evidence to show that one had to have occurred nonetheless.
If what we have in the LA Mayoral election is a statistical anomaly that is beyond reasonable explanation with anything besides fraud, that is enough to prove a crime. This has been true since the beginning of Western Civlization.
Peru Voting:
It’s mandatory for citizens over 18 otherwise you are fined.
No mail in ballots all in person.
One day to vote.
Have to show your D.N.I./id
Given the ballot to vote right there, no sample ballots.
Counting complete in less than 48 hours for entire country.
My wife is a Peruvian citizen, I’m not so I don’t vote here.
California’s machine didn’t bury Spencer Pratt because he was on track to win Los Angeles. They buried him because he was already making the entire rigged operation look mortal.
That’s the part they can’t afford. A pragmatic outsider running on crime, homelessness, and basic competence ... using modern AI-driven ads instead of the same tired yard signs and mailers ... started cutting through the hopelessness they’ve spent years cultivating.
He wasn’t some generic Republican reciting talking points. He was showing people what a fixed city could actually look like, and too many were starting to pay attention.
So they moved. Not in November, when a Pratt run might have made Karen Bass uncomfortable. They moved now, in the primary, because five more months of him existing would have done permanent damage to the illusion that resistance is pointless in California.
The machine can survive losing. It cannot survive voters realizing the game isn’t as locked down as they’ve been told.
This was panic dressed up as inevitability.
When the establishment has to openly kneecap a candidate in the jungle primary just to protect the narrative, it tells you everything about how fragile their control actually is.
They didn’t kill his campaign to save the city. They killed it to save the con. And everyone watching just saw the mask slip.
(article below)
Any election in which it’s forbidden by law to identify who is voting
AND mail ballots are automatically blasted out to every registered voter
AND voters are automatically registered with a drivers license
AND drivers licenses are given to noncitizens
AND its illegal for licensing authorities to ask for citizenship status
AND a massive political machine exists to ballot harvest for one party only
…is fundamentally illegitimate.
@KeishaH18533476@spencerpratt So cleaning up the homeless issue, keeping parks safe for moms and kids, making sure potholes are fixed and streetlights work and making efforts to ensure cities are not burned down is MAGA? Because that was pretty much his platform….
The problem with the voter id issue is Huntington Beach passed a law to enable voter id for elections. Then guess what happened, AG Bonta sued and won the case taking it to the California Supreme Court.
So even if the proposition for voter ID passes, if Bonta wins re-election it will probably be struck down too by the courts. The only way to fix it is pass the Save Act.
Limit mail in ballots, strike down ballot harvesting and require ID to vote. I bet we would see some different outcomes in California.
Since I have the attention of people like @tedlieu:
We don't trust you. At all. We don't trust anyone in your government. Your election processes should be so unimpeachable that even if you were all corrupt knaves (which we think you are), that we could have no possible complaint about how you are conducting elections.
Instead you go the opposite direction. You rub our noses in your rejection of election integrity rules that are standard throughout the civilized world, and then you DARE insult us for questioning what we see.
Yeah, screw you. Keep it up, and one day the Republican House will refuse to seat California's so-called representatives.
I’m very curious, don’t campaigns have internal polls that the public does not see that tells them the direction a candidate is going? If they thought they had a chance wouldn’t they tell her to come out and give some “It’s not over til it’s over” kind of speech? Instead of the weeping frail one she gave????
You vote on election day.
Ballots are only mailed to those that ask for them.
Absentee are confined to military, aged, infirm and absent, out of town, state, country. Strict.
No drop-off boxes.
No same day registration.
No provisional, same day registration voting allowed.
Return to American voting.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Nithya Raman cry like a baby and concede on Tuesday? Now she’s suddenly about to overtake Spencer Pratt.
Candidates usually know their internal numbers on election day, which is why this raises serious questions. The results we saw on Tuesday and the reactions from the candidates was the real thing. What we are seeing now is third world communism at work.
California, demand transparency and accountability. Every legal vote should be counted, and the public deserves confidence in the outcome.
@SteveHiltonx@spencerpratt@GOPLosAngeles@CAGOP
Interesting how she was trailing in the campaign and running a pretty lackluster campaign. I bet 80% or more of voters had no idea who she was, except in her district where in her last election she received approximately 35k votes. All of the sudden people woke up and said yeah, she seems better than Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt????
Here is why California will forever be corrupt as it relates to voting:
They created the jungle primary because it was the best way to keep from having to compete with Republicans, knowing California was a strong blue state.
When that backfired because Californians were starting to go purple and slowly red, they ensured no ID was needed to vote and mail-in would save the day.
To ensure that didn’t fail, they allowed counting of ballots for 30 days, to ensure that if their desired candidates were struggling, the aforementioned mail-in could save the day. Basically they keep counting until the win.
They created a law that would keep anyone from investigating illegal activities with the voting process. That’s called corruption. We are doomed out here. The only good thing we have left here is the weather.
@RupaliChadhaMD Ever hit bistro and POW, my older brother loved that place. Another favorite of my father’s was Jake’s at the Shore and later on The Outlaw.
@RupaliChadhaMD It’s a beautiful place lived there in the mid 70s until 2003. A great little town with some very good restaurants. I miss the Bobs Big Boy the most, I used to eat there 3 times a week!