Fred_Lin

BTC Holder Since 2013,Co-Founder@TopCrypto Ventures

[Fred_Lin @fredlin1989]

@LayerZero_Core KelpDAO: -25% responsibility — placed excessive trust in LayerZero and used LayerZero’s single in-house DVN.
Aave: -15% responsibility — identified the issue but failed to remediate it; risk controls were inadequate, and exposure to rsETH became too large too quickly.

[Fred_Lin @fredlin1989]

@LayerZero_Core From a purely third-party perspective, the allocation of responsibility for this incident is:
LayerZero: -60% responsibility — allowed a single DVN configuration; its in-house DVN was compromised.

[Fred_Lin @fredlin1989]

@Super4DeFi LayerZero负60%，责任：允许单一DVN,自营DVN被攻击；

kelpdao负25%，责任：过度信任L0,用单一L0的自营DVN；

Aave负15%，责任：发现问题不整改,风控措施不到位对rsETH敞口暴露太大太快。

[Fred_Lin @fredlin1989]

@euler_mab In my opinion that rsETH on ETH and Arbitrum are supported by reserves.

[Fred_Lin @fredlin1989]

@aave In my opinion that rsETH on ETH and Arbitrum are supported by reserves.