3 picks for the day:
$BALD on base
0x28c74b28429df12d1f39f244f5c72fd472847a6b
$MAO on bsc
0x7000d993c42a07ba104faff3090be2251a407777
$WINFREY on solana
5RY49DU5fBHHpqgpFPkbZWk4JdNCpNGRjf8pfiD4pump
nfa dyor
check the coin read the web look up the dev and then realise its at 2k mc & up to u
2GsS7pdaNMpDG34kqQFxUTndF92zPxjm69TQn7rgpump
Also got a free trade on the Beta so running both
F1gB34BTJUSGqioGip4CaVawR1Kk8aRPQDToZ94Ppump
Independent researchers have published a technical analysis of the USD1 smart contract.
#USD1 solana:USD1ttGY1N17NEEHLmELoaybftRBUSErhqYiQzvEmuB @worldlibertyfi#WLFI
Everyone holding or considering USD1 should read it carefully.
To put it in the bluntest terms, per their findings:
USD1's highest-level permissions allow the issuer to move USD1 out of YOUR account into its own wallet — or anyone else's — without your consent. Cold wallet? Multisig? Doesn't matter. The authority operates at the token contract level. Nothing you do can stop it.
Let that sink in:
this is a "stablecoin" whose issuer holds the technical power to reach into any holder's wallet and take the funds.
And there's a second finding that, frankly, is even more disturbing.
Per the researchers' analysis, the USD1 source code published on World Liberty's official GitHub does NOT match the code actually deployed on-chain.
The published version contains no "drain" or "reallocate" functions. The deployed version — after an April 2026 upgrade — contains both.
Anyone in crypto knows exactly what that pattern is. Showing auditors and users a clean codebase while running different code on-chain is the signature technique of rug pulls.
It sits at the top of every blockchain security firm's fraud-detection checklist — because there is no innocent reason to publish one contract and deploy another. Its only function is to defeat scrutiny.
A company that is currently seeking a U.S. national trust bank charter is using a playbook straight out of the exit-scam manual.
And as I allege in my Complaint, this is not the first time. The same pattern — backdoor functions added after the fact, contrary to public representations — is exactly what happened with the $WLFI token itself. First $WLFI. Now USD1. Once is a design choice. Twice is a pattern.
Don't take my word for it. Don't take theirs. The contracts are on-chain — verify every claim yourself. That's what blockchains are for.
The funniest thing just happened.
Justin Sun is going absolute BEAST MODE on Coinbase, Binance and Hyperliquid's AML mechanisms.
He is DUSTING everyone who interacted with Coinbase, Binance or HL before with a few USDT from HTX.
HTX is under sanctions in the EU and the UK since May 26th - any owner of an address that received money from it in the past 3-4 months received a freeze from Coinbase until they show "proof" that they weren't using a blacklisted financial entity.
Binance announced it will restrict deposits and withdrawals involving 11 platforms including HTX from 23 August - so clearly this is in retaliation.
By doing this now - Justin Sun is basically forcing the hand of Coinbase and Binance, and regulators in the EU (which CB/Binance always lobbies) to legitimize HTX as a real business entity.
Or end up with thousands of pissed off users.
Only in crypto.