@vadim_web3 For me, NEAR’s biggest value is chain abstraction and usability. I hope more users discover NEAR and join for exactly that reason.
And btw, I can access AAVE directly through HOT Wallet too. That’s the kind of multichain experience I value.
@vadim_web3 Так а нахуя ты тогда хуйню пишешь? 😆
Начали с того, что NEAR L1 существует ради обогащения инсайдеров и его надо закрыть. А теперь выясняется, что Polygon работает по той же модели.
Так, может, и надо было сразу обсуждать экономику, а не необходимость существования NEAR?
@vadim_web3 And one more question,
Vadim: which blockchain wasn’t designed, at least in part, to let insiders profit and give early adopters a greater opportunity to build wealth than those who came later?
Is Polygon somehow an exception?
@vadim_web3 NEAR Intents settles on NEAR too. Inflation and L1 sustainability are fair questions. But claiming the L1 mainly enriches insiders needs evidence. And you literally wrote “Just shut down L1.” I’m not a dev, just a user who wants NEAR to keep its L1.
@vadim_web3 Vadim, you asked what I actually use on NEAR: HOT Wallet, JustHoot, Nearly, native tokens and Rhea Finance. I make real on-chain transactions, not just cross-chain swaps. NEAR is my home base in a multichain world.
@vadim_web3 I have a NEAR-based multichain wallet, apps, and infrastructure that make using different chains convenient.
For me, NEAR is my home base in the multichain world.
So I honestly don’t understand your argument that NEAR should shut down its L1 and move somewhere else.