This is my last post, I'm also on
threads: https://t.co/Cs1GkXudw1
bsky: https://t.co/dTW6ak10yn
LinkedIn: https://t.co/kTXBxpx1F3
mastodon: https://t.co/dVcn1qBLLu
and our group is on insta: https://t.co/GDEGyeyhOg
On all of these I reach more people than on this platform.
@AlexWilkins22 The foundations of the #machinelearning#nobelprize are well established in physics. In the late 1980s, the first applications were being developed to find tracks of particles in particle physics detectors. Check out the first physics use paper here: https://t.co/4XhCZs6eOI
@spektrum Übrigens: In diese wissenschaftliche Studie haben die Deutschen Experimentalphysik und theoretische Physik einen großen deutschen Anteil. Mehr: https://t.co/YouNLEbUkB
@IvovanVulpen ach in ieder geval bellen de ouders jou nog niet (dat gebeurt ook) "diederikje heeft zo hard gewerkt, hij verdient een hoger cijfer", dat werk.
@TaraShears@CMSExperiment I do wonder if we need to have the SM reference from the year when those experimental results were done in the plot, it would be more exciting/fair in many ways :)
@IvovanVulpen btw, if you use more 'retro' theory calculations, it is possible to get to the CDF result.... I have for a while been convinced that that is the reason it's off. It is impossible to proof because the article in science is way too short to give enough detail. Which is a real pity.
@ChristianGrefe@CMSExperiment DESY News: W-Boson auf der Teilchenwaage - Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY https://t.co/YouNLEbUkB you mean the 20 year old LEP results :)