@elite_gz agree with the general point but the-dream didn't have hipster fans in the aughts, unless you count very niche online communities. hipster were latecomers who got on board with love king in 2010
@BrianCAlbrecht it's repeat cross-section data so wage estimates include composition bias. their follow up paper using longitudinal admin data is better on wages https://t.co/rkaZy5Rf1i
unemployment and LFP are the interesting CZ-level outcomes in ADH
@ding3rs i agree with that. i just don't think the PQ share alone is sufficient to gauge legitimacy of a referendum. since many of the non-PQ parties are close substitutes
@ding3rs@anonamn0@mattyglesias most QS ridings were held by PQ prior to 2012. the share of CAQ voters who are separatist is unknown but imo well above zero. Frechette was a member of the PQ until 2013. they are anti-referendum as a matter of strategy, not principle
@mattkahn1966 i think @arpitrage's point was that even if Matthew's preference for comfort and safety are stable, there will be an influx of AI agents participating in the economy, and their preferences are unknown
Reviewer 1 has already seen estimates from standard TWFE, stacked DD, and CSDID. All tell the same story. Now R1 wants to see Sun and Abraham, as well as Borusyak, Jaravel, and Spiess in the second round. I think this type of request should immediately disqualify the reviewer.