Kuun Pao

Proud immigrant and successful businessman

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie @stephm61 @feismom_ny @whec_rleclair Wow! Not only do you assume people's guilt without evidence, you assume I'm on a legal team with no evidence too. Seeing a pattern here.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@cklino @whec_rleclair That statement is actually untrue. Many of the items have multiple contributors. Some of the DNA doesn't belong to any of the four on trial.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@stephm61 Maybe even only two of the four were there during the actual murder. We don't know. The jury doesnt know so how can they convict all 4 of M2

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@stephm61 That maybe only 3 of the 4 were there and the fourth was dragged in due to one of those factors ya know?

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@stephm61 Cleaned up after the fact. Keep in mind that it's possible not all four were even there. Because of DNA and blood transfer, it's possible

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@stephm61 Well nobody actually knows for a fact. But for eg. (due to having the bloodiest pants) it was Colin, and then other def cleaned up

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Your posts just seem awfully masochistic... You refuse to see both sides of the argument, which do exist. Clearly not in your mind though.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Wow, that's flattering! You think I'm a lawyer? Really, I'm just making sure other points of view are being seen on #rideouttrial.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Stated in this article that Colin bought two bottles. And I'm not sure but possible that the tarp purchased at Walmart wasn't the one used.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie https://t.co/vJZ0Z6avBV

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Colin's name comes up the most and seems to be the common thread but outside of that, I don't see too much evidence pointing to other def.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie I'm simply saying that maybe not all four are involved. Could just be one or two. Sure looks like at least one person was involved.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie then person A absolutely must've known person B's intentions. Obviously that's not how it works in court.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Says the guy who makes illogical jumps believing that if person A purchases item X and person B uses that to clean up a murder,

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie @stephm61 @whec_rleclair Proof of what? You see circumstantial evidence that doesn't even place anybody at the crime scene during the murder.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@MomProc @whec_rleclair Beautiful children you have there Michelle. Would you turn them in for a life sentence?

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie Idk, maybe someone who finds out after the fact and doesn't want to turn a family member in for a life sentence? Not a tough question.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@whec_rleclair Bloody clothing does not equal murder. Could point to clean up. Real question is what jury can/will convict on.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@KillersLie @stephm61 @whec_rleclair Well there are no "short steps." We're talking about people's lives here. Convictions can't happen without proof - which is lacking.

[Kuun Pao @fuk_kuun]

@katekruk @chezsanchez @Keywest40 Yes, required to hand over to defense attorneys during discovery. Doesn't mean it will be used during trial.