@Blessing_OI@Only1Vee_Kiee You are living under bondage in the name of "church", which is not what church led by Christ should be.
Don't advice another person to get under that bondage. There's no benefits attached to such bondage.
Believe in the finished work of Christ and enjoy your limitless freedom!
@EmmySantinho@firstladyship I read as much of the information out there as possible. I've written doctoral & post-doctoral theses on some.
But I'm not filled wit morbid fear!
I don't underestimate their powers. I don't overestimate them either.
Read to be wise, but not to become overwhelmed with morbidity.
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 You know what? I've wasted much resourceful time trying to wake someone who is pretending to be asleep.
Time to face real serious matters.
Enjoy your sleep
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 You tell us what happened.
But it will be mischievous of you to start assuming PO was the one that signed the law when u don't have evidence that he did, because we have already established other similar laws that came into existence which he didn't sign.
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 Because of ur ego, u are calling false something that is written in black and white. Read the first two laws. Tell me how they didn't sought to grant d lawmakers more autonomy and shield them from financial accountability (they could waste State resources without accountability)
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 If u agree that witout evidence, we can neither say he signed or didn't sign that law, then posts like the one made here, which ssert that he signed the bill into law should not be made.
Because the poster is using something that COULD be false to malign PO, and that's wrong!
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 Some are similar because they sort to give immunity to the lawmakers (politicians), grant them power to have access to the State treasury without executive oversight, etc. Such bills if passed into law (which they eventually did) will create room for wastage of State resources
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 Let me spoonfeed you with the SIX bills they vetoed him in 2007 to sign into law. See the attached screenshots.
Notice that majority of them have to do with protecting and expanding politicians rights, similar to what that ex-governor's pension bill was also all about
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 U argue ignorantly without evidence. The State assembly vetoed him in 2007 to pass SIX bills into law. None of them was about the LG elections.
Stop spewing falsehood and arguing with it.
Unless u are truly such a treacherous person. I want to believe u are not!
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 I have shown you the evidence that the State assembly did veto him to pass certain bills into law. I think this is the point where u have to stop arguing, and accept that, without evidence, one can't boldly say he was the one who signed the ex-governor's pension bill into law.
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 I have replied u in another comment.
In 2007, the assembly passed 6 bills which he refused to sign into law. They vetoed him to pass the bills into law.
Since a precedence of them vetoing him exists, there's no way u can just assume without evidence that he signed the bill
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 Read the attached screenshot below to see that in 2007 alone, the state assembly vetoed PO to pass 6 bills into law.
The precedence of them vetoing him to pass bills into law exist.
Therefore, there is no logical basis upon which u can assume he was the one who signed the bill
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 There is no connection! Increase in tax and levy is an entirely different topic from ex-governor's pension.
PO is not against increase in govt revenue. He can sign a bill to that effect into law.
He's against greed & waste. He most likely didn't sign d pension bill into law!
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 I said u should bring evidence of PO signing bills that supports squandering State resources into law. U brought up increase in tax & levy.
How is that similar to governor's pension bill?
D two are not similar. U can't say bcos he signed one into law, it means he signed d other
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 Reread what you wrote and make it make sense.
"When he increased taxes and levies... Did he sign it? If yes... On wgat basis do you think he didn't sign this?"
How does increasing taxes and levies translate to the assumption that he signed the bill? How do the two connect?
@apantakuss2@adedapoOA@sector00007 How did increasing taxes & levies jump into dis discuss of who signed governors' pension bill into law?
What sort of cacophony is this?
And u say u are coherent?
If u are opposing PO based on unverifiable assumptions and not verified facts, u represent the darkest of depravity!