@ModernDayDebate@paleochristcon@RealCandaceO Was it modeled with only one side able to ask questions? And the debate specifically purposed as defending the “overwhelming evidence” vs. “patsy” theories with zero scope creep?
@realstewpeters PBD: "The topic of discussion today, how this got prompted is Andrew, you said there’s overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk. And Candace, your position was he’s a patsy." Too bad they never got to actually debate this.
@barnes_law PBD: The topic of discussion today, how this got prompted is Andrew, you said there’s overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk. And Candace, your position was he’s a patsy.
The debate on evidence never happened.
@rageBronsonYT PBD - "The topic of discussion today, how this got prompted is Andrew, you said there’s overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk. And Candace, your position was he’s a patsy." The highest bar was in reviewing the evidence (which never happened).
@DiligentDenizen Not sure it's even relevant. It's not illegal to be in a public place, own a firearm, own a car, own a screwdriver or to Dremel anything. I hope there is real evidence if this kid actually did it. It's only clear from the rooftop video that a human being was up there.
@Rach4Patriarchy I was hoping the debate was going to be on the topic of actually reviewing the overwhelming evidence supporting the 7 charges. But, it had nothing to do with that at all. A complete waste of time.
@CrucibleOnX I have seen evidence that the kid was legally in a public place, legally owning a firearm and legally owning a douche bag car. Could be bigfoot on the rooftop. I hope the prosecution has some real "positive evidence".
@paleochristcon Was hoping to see a debate on the evidence going charge by charge. Ended up being a debate on nothing. Complete waste of time and money. Right now it appears that this kid is guilty of being in a public place, owning a firearm and owning douchebag car.