@Fentuo_ But why apply it selectively. The case of Olise and the Paraguay player who went to the ground like he was hit with a hammer in the face? Why didn't VAR intervene to reverse the card?
@Ken_carson57@pe_1968@UEFA Teams suffer the consequences of human error. How about the player who got red for covering mouth,which was not applied in all the subsequent games in this tournament? Should they go back in time and let him play the game he missed?
@Ken_carson57@pe_1968@UEFA Off the pitch decision are not same as the on field ref decisions. If ref gave Jude red card for his actions, then it'll be same. Not the case. Player got red card for covering mouth in the world cup, flimsy grounds, yet he served the suspension. What's special about USA's case?
@Ken_carson57@pe_1968@UEFA Off the pitch decisions and bans are different. They are not anchored on predetermined black-and-white fifa rules. Check all the world cups, find a scenario where fifa suspended a card penalty, irrespective of how bias or wrong the ref acted. Errors are part of the game.
@Ken_carson57@pe_1968@UEFA Americans keep confusing their "football" with the beautiful game. Red card=suspension. Simple! Only way to get out of it is to appeal the red card. If card is nullified by fifa, which they can, then the ban is lifted. But you can't uphold the card but remove the consequence.
@Perf13Medal@MarioNawfal The decisions for dangerous tackles are not based on the intentions. Footballers are not psychos to commit leg-breaking, career ending fouls on intention! It is the danger posed by the tackles that warrants the card.
@liabinkin You either suspend the red card or apply the fifa rules, not make up rules. If the red card stands, so does the punishment. Those are FIFA rules. If he commits a similar foul in the future, that's another red card with its own penalties...
@b_hadan@Ohta_Ryota Hospitals are suffering. Allocated amounts barely cover 50% of annual salaries. They're forced to spend whatever little they generate on recurring expenditures and buying medications. No money left to expand or improve care.
@Luuchike@OkiyaOmtatah@KaranjaMatindi@jsckenya Did you even read his text. He is not complaining about the decision, but that it doesn't give reasons for the ruling to allow him to proceed to higher courts you are mentioning.
@RobertAlai Politics did not stop WHO, their own in-house corruption did. They got the land and still use the KUTRRH space.
As for Ebola, the isolation centres are just equipped tents that'll be dismantled and incinerated after use. But the US during these times should be welcomed.
@BlackGold2680@AfricanHub_ It may be a fake, hopefully, but that's not what it states. It doesn't refer to those "whose waivers end or ended" but rather terminatess the waivers of all African nationals as of 31st May.
@dmdenniss570@UDAKenya Wrong assumption! The 3% reduction was factored in before the ksh 28 rise in price. So, this does not mean a reduction in prices as earlier communicated by EPRA.
@elisha_odu97464@Goddie_Ke So, we're to assume the OAG is auditing 2017 books in 2026?! Or, more likely, she is talking of a different loan than the one you're quoting?! Share the OAG report, which is also a public document, and confirm it is the same issue!
@CharlesGakiri@HonAdenDuale Privatize? It is a private institution run by an umbrella of shareholders, KHA. The government has no stake or shares. No taxes or public funds go into the annual running of the facility.
@Adele_lide That's stupid! Govt hospitals are public hospitals bcoz the public finances them thru taxes. Govt/public hospitals get annual budgetary allocation. Like all private hospitals, NH does not run by citizen taxes but its own resources.
@amenya_nelson Hii pia ni fake. He apparently visited the cafe in 2024. The country is at war, yet the video to disprove his death is him at a cafe rather than press briefing?! Something fishy is going on.