Thread 🧵| How can we industrialize Pakistan in 10-15 years?
1. We set up companies.
2. We provide them with engineers and technical skill to bring their production to industrial standards by giving them access to international markets and technicians.
Why are you hesitant to partition KP?
Chitral, Swat, and Hazara should be separate provinces or merged back with West Punjab (Potohar).
As the Dardics, Swatis, and Hazarewal do not want to deal with backward Pashtuns who are pulling their legs.
Here’s how the new provinces should be structured to avoid problems:
Balochistan
- South Pakhtunkhwa
- Balochistan
- Makran
Sindh
- Upper Sindh
- Lower Sindh
Punjab
- Bahawalpur
- Punjab
- Potohar
- Multan
Or Every existing division
Pakhtunkhwa
- FATA areas
- Pakhtunkhwa
We were forced to relinquish NWFP to the Pathans, who now claim Attock, Isb, and Rawalpindi.
We relinquished Hazara, and they now claim Hindko is not a dialect of Punjabi.
We relinquished Pahār, which was renamed "Kashmir."
Do you believe it'll be any different this time?
Permanent solution of South Punjab issue would be to merge areas west of the Indus with Balochistan, at least for the time being.
This would remove Baloch waderas and 10 million Saraiki-speaking Baloch from Punjab's politics.
@MaryamNSharif@fawadchaudhry
@MaryamNSharif Buses purchased with the tax dollars of law-abiding Punjabis who elected you and gave you a mandate to send them to other provinces rather than focusing on less developed cities?
History today mirrors this map before Islam: Iran controls Gulf, Iraq, and Yemen; Byzantine [Israel] controls Levant and Egypt; and Arabia is surrounded. Then, Prophet Mohammed united all Arabs under the flag of Islam.
@XOTWo4@LMAR_PK47 You make it sound as if them parasitizing our economy and resources is a good thing. Peshawar and its surrounding areas were already part of Punjab before the brits.
@XOTWo4@LMAR_PK47 You make it sound as if them parasitizing our economy and resources is a good thing. Peshawar and its surrounding areas were already part of Punjab before the brits.
He's based for everything liberals despise him for. However, all of his schemes backfired on Pakistan. His reliance on America caused the army to lose professionalism. His Afghan policy was a complete disaster. He officially began the economic boom and bust cycles.
Controversial Opinion: Zia-ul-Haq was a net positive for Pakistan. He ended Bhutto's communist/socialist agenda. Had Zia remained in power for another 20 years, Pakistan would have enjoyed greater economic prosperity and be spared the utterly incompetent govt's of Benazir & Nawaz
@Jasrat__Khokhar You are correct that these figures should be given proper credit, and invaders should not be glorified in our books. However, the new Punjabi generation does not see them as heroes, and a Punjabi cultural revolution would be the final nail in the coffin.
Punjabi nationalism and Pakistani nationalism can coexist. The establishment lacked an ideological narrative against the TTP, BLA, PTI, and other hostile groups. Empowering Punjabis can also help them root out these rats while strengthening the Pakistani standing.
Punjabis have zero advantage of letting this perfect geography and resources go.
We just need to make this federation work for our interests like it has been working against us for the past century.
Like Türkiye for Turks, Pakoland for Punjabis.
@dqvelish It's not hard to get around that. Simply refer to Punjabi nationalism as Indus nationalism, which is now essentially an umbrella term because Pakistan is entirely based on the Indus basin.