Gaja

Connect thru prayer. Belief is the 1st step. All roads lead to the same truth. Red-pilled in the early 90's

[Karl Stefanovic @karlstefanovic]

Tonight, 8pm - Our new Tuesday night show, The UK Brief.

Former Chaplain to the Queen, Gavin Ashenden, says King Charles abandoned the 500-year-old description of "Defender of the Faith", replacing it with "protects the space for Faith within the multi-faith nation" because he has gone woke, something he says the Queen would call 'a disaster.'

He also warns Britain is running out of time to restore freedom of speech.
8PM.

[Karl Stefanovic @karlstefanovic]

When Adam Brooks was 11, his father was murdered by a machete gang. Years later, he survived a violent home invasion himself.

Today, he's one of Britain's most outspoken voices on crime, immigration and free speech.

He says the grooming gangs scandal was "covered up" and those who spoke out risked losing everything.

Our interview. Tonight, 5pm. @EssexPR

[Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108]

Albo couldn’t wait to jump on the cancel Karl bandwagon.

Now Karl has fired back - rightly pointing out the PM lied to the people yet still gets to keep is job.

One man condemned for speaking freely and honestly.

The other lies to the entire Nation and stays in power.

The sheer hypocrisy of it all is astounding.

[Matthew Camenzuli @Matt_Camenzuli]

This is why @karlstefanovic is cancelled.

This 2 minute bit.

The part where @TRobinsonNewEra speaks the suppressed truth.

It does not have to be this way. But the mainstream media did just prove his point.

Let people speak.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to:

• Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us
• Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians
• A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed
• Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the *fact* that men are not women
• A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport
• Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport
• School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms
• Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them

The current *interpretation* of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished.

Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane.

This is not a “culture war”, @AlboMP. It’s a war on women & girls.

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

It takes a lot to shock Joe Rogan like that.

Definitely worth a watch

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Our rape gang inquiry released a statement this morning detailing the most brutal suffering anyone could imagine on an innocent young woman - if you have not read it, I urge you to go and digest it. People need to understand what has happened, and is still happening.

I sat for two hours, listening to that brave woman.

It was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life.

Before our hearings, I did not think it was possible for one human to inflict such evil onto another human.

It is.

We have requested a meeting with the Home Secretary, so that Mahmood can hear what we have heard. So that she can finally understand.

I sincerely hope she accepts.

The individual who came forward is amongst the bravest women I have ever met. Just remarkable courage that I hold such respect for.

Every single person who has come forward to tell their story is a hero in my eyes.

All so that others don’t suffer what they did.

It takes a very special individual to do that.

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

To celebrate the launch of 𝗔 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗲 and 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮 𝗗𝗮𝘆 we've put this fantastic film clip out today.

When we phoned Holly Valance to write us a song for the movie, she instantly said yes.

A massive shout out to Holly who I know watched the film last night and spat water across the room during one particular scene. Tells me the jokes landed really well 🤣

The song is available for download on iTunes. NOTE: If enough copies are sold, the song will be forced to be played on stations across the country, including Triple J. 

Wouldn't the ABC have a heart attack knowing they had to play this track!

None of this would have been possible without Mark and Sebastian at Stepmates Studios as well. Proud of you guys!

DOWNLOAD: https://t.co/N1PlkK1jjK

[Senator Matt Canavan @mattjcan]

This evening I have read the Government's proposed antisemitism, hate and extremism laws. The proposed laws are undemocratic, unconstitutional and so vague that they could easily be used to unjustly silence legitimate criticism of government policy.

I can not support these laws.

We do not need new laws like this to defeat the radical Islamist extremism that have killed Australians. We already have laws against inciting violence. They should be enforced.

These proposed laws were only released today and the Government plans to force them through Parliament in just a week. Labor is giving people just three days to comment on the laws. It is a mockery of our democratic process.

I have written an article for CQToday on why I oppose the laws. This would normally print on Saturday but I am publishing it below so people can read now because of the truncated legislative process.

---

In 1950, the Menzies Government introduced laws to ban the Australian Communist Party. Prime Minister Menzies told the Parliament that communists must be banned because they had "perfected the technique" of "peace demonstrations ... not to promote peace but to prevent or impair defence preparations in the democracies."

The Parliament voted for the laws but the High Court struck them down as unconstitutional and the Australian Communist Party was allowed to continue.

Just like the 1950s, politicians are seeking to pass draconian and unconstitutional laws so they can be seen to be doing something about an ideological threat. The last few years have seen mass protests to "Free Palestine". Some of these protestors have expressed repulsive views. Some blame these protests for creating the fertile ground upon which the tragic Bondi attacks occurred.

Next week the Australian Parliament is being recalled to pass laws against "antisemitism, hate and extremism". Politicians are once again acting under the delusion that we can defeat ideas (even repulsive ones) by criminalising them. Just like the Menzies Government's attempts in the 1950s, it is the wrong approach.

The Government's laws provide unprecedented powers to the government to control the speech and communication of the Australian people. The laws define a "hate crime". A hate crime can be anything that causes, or would cause, "serious harm to a person" based on conduct that targeted a person's "race or national or ethnic origin".

Groups that are suspected of conducting such hate crimes can be banned.

People that "promote or incite hatred of another person ... because of [their] race, colour or national or ethnic origin" can face five years in jail if their speech causes someone "to be intimidated". The law says that it is "immaterial wheter ... the conduct actually results in any person feeling intimidated."

The proposed laws are so vague that a wide variety of legitimate political communication could be banned.

The current government is facing significant criticism of its immigration policies that have allowed 1.3 million migrants into Australia in just three years. I have argued that we should not take so many people in from countries that have different cultures and customs than us so quickly. We must make sure people that do move here adopt our values and lifestyles. Taking in so many people so quickly simply overwhelms our ability to assimilate people while maintaining a harmonious country.

My argument against mass migration could easily fall foul of the above definitions because what makes someone "intimidated" is left vague and undefined. The proposed laws provide no protections for political communication which is a right due to all Australians under the Australian Constitution.

These laws could easily become a trojan horse to silence criticism of politicians, not to protect people from hate. It should never be a crime in a democracy (let alone in Australia) to express hate towards politicians.

The laws also allow authorities to tap your phones if they suspect you of committing hate crimes. The laws are retrospective so that even things done before the laws come into effect can be deemed hate crimes.

The Australian Government would rely on an international agreement against racism as the basis on which it has the power to pass these laws.

Just because a politician says something is racist does not make it so. As Justice Fullagar said in striking down Menzies attempt to ban the Communist Party:

> A power to make laws with respect to lighthouses does not authorize the making of a law with respect to anything which is, in the opinion of the law-maker, a lighthouse.

The Government's proposed laws are not about outlawing hate against other persons, they are aimed at outlawing criticism of governments.

We defeated communism not by passing laws but by pointing out how silly a dictatorship of the proletariat was.

We should heed that lesson to defeat the radical Islamic ideology that inspired the murder of 15 innocent Jewish Australians last year. We already have laws that make it illegal to promote violence. They should be enforced instead of passing new laws that restrict the free speech of all Australians and not tackle the division that we have unnecessarily imported into Australia.

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Australians are turning on Anthony Albanese over his refusal to accept responsibility for the Bondi terror attack.

The broader community, and even members of his own cabinet, are calling for a Royal Commission into radical Islam.

Sign our petition and show the Prime Minister he can’t ignore your voice any longer: https://t.co/7BpUYzVtAF

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

The Labor Government believes sexually assaulting 17 Aussie women in our country is acceptable.

Get these predators out of our country & this sick, deranged Government have to go 😡

Only White men are deported under Labor..

[One Nation Australia @OneNationAus]

The Super Progressive Movie trailer is here.

According to bureaucrats, this trailer is too controversial and may offend a person to be screened in Parliament House which caused a last minute swap to another theatre in Canberra.

The movie launches on Australia Day 2026 and can be pre-ordered online https://t.co/1IQY6yS4g9

#Movie #OneNation #PaulineHanson #SuperProgressiveMovie #Banned #Cinema #Launch #ScreenAustralia #AussieMovies

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

This may be the single funniest moment in the history of live TV.

Jesse Waters asks Kid Rock what he’s going to be for Halloween. Kid Rock’s puts on a mask then says something that sends the whole Fox News studio screaming.

Waters is in tears 🤣

Comedy. Our country is healing

[Senator Alex Antic @SenatorAntic]

The Office of the eSafety Commissioner has produced a guidance note to assist social media companies with the fast approaching under 16 social media ban.

The methods used to verify age are likely to include the disclosure of sensitive data like documents, facial scans, location data and even biometrics.

This data will be handled by foreign companies like TikTok but what happens to it then?

Yesterday I asked the eSafety Commissioner about data security as part of the under 16 social media ban.

To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

https://t.co/Y0LPwr8Tgp

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

Lucy Connolly reveals she plead GUILTY because of scare tactics used against her.

Just like all the other political prisoners!

[Kari Lake @KariLake]

🤔 ….and who hand-delivered the bogus Steele Dossier to the FBI?

[Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins]

Batshit Bonkers Britain

All the love to @JeremyClarkson and @ClarksonsFarm1