@Bkclaims How'd you come accross this? As a market maker are they able to not trade against a counterparty who they believe has these patterns or are they obligated to make the market regardless of price if they think the counterparty has information?
Three crashes. Nine trucks. A conditional safety rating. C.H. Robinson hired them anyway, violating its own policies. The driver hit a parked truck at full speed after midnight and fled. Montgomery lost his leg.
On Wednesday SCOTUS decides if the company whose only job was picking who drives the truck can face any liability for picking badly.
Full preview: https://t.co/Glp0Ug6NCE #SCOTUS #MontgomeryVCaribe
@FedSoc The government's strongest argument for disarming marijuana users turns on what the founders thought about drunks. It's a better analogy than you'd expect. Broke down the briefs ahead of tomorrow's argument. https://t.co/ZwN40Gio3k
Looking forward to following along. Wrote up a pre-argument breakdown of the briefs if anyone wants context going in. The government's habitual-drunkard analogy is stronger than most coverage suggests, but Hemani's use-versus-abuse distinction is the counter to watch. https://t.co/DlnEnPSn1l
Can the government strip your gun rights because you smoke weed? Over 60 million Americans reported past-year marijuana use. Tomorrow SCOTUS hears United States v. Hemani to decide whether that's enough to lose your Second Amendment rights. The answer turns on what the founders thought about drunks.
https://t.co/DlnEnPRPbN
https://t.co/N99TH4I6gm #SCOTUS #SecondAmendment #Hemani #2A #SupremeCourt
@marcorandazza This is apparently the second appeal I this case, does the appelate court take matters into its own hands at some point? Or reassign to another judge?
@bennpeifert@KrisAbdelmessih I've been studying your writings on selling premium not being a free lunch, price being key etc. I'm curious if there is anyone you respect that fundamentally disagrees with your vol market philosophy?