@yeboy1987@PsyconauTherapy@fgo_addict_ Ok great, answer this hypothetical. Imagine if one liked fked up shit with infants/toddlers in clear anime style. Would you and loli fan's arguments still apply
@Brother_Nier2 I'm just going to say this so I can spite these mfers. So if they truly believe that its ok because its not real, no one is being harmed, and people can keep it in the fantasy without moving it to reality. Would they not find it screwed up if the same content involved infants?
@Brother_Nier2 Now I'm having people flock to my tweets. tbh IDC afaik none of them have proven me wrong. I stand by my take. Cope and seeth pro loli crowd
@TomtheGenius64@PsyconauTherapy@fgo_addict_ This discussion is not about whether or not loli is bad at least with my posts. It's whether if Japan views it as CP (virtual or not).
@TomtheGenius64@PsyconauTherapy@fgo_addict_ The only point I'm trying to prove is that Japan sees this content as virtual CP. Whether they should or not is another discussion or whether they legally should see it as such is another story
@finalmasterm0dx Yes I'm not denying that Japan sees it as legal. Child semantic wordings aside, None of that changes the fact that they still categorize it as virtual CP. Whether they should or not, is another discussion to be had
@PsyconauTherapy@fgo_addict_ Okay guys I think we can all agree that fictional/virtual CP (which is still CP just a different subsection of it) is classified well in their national law. Literally found this by clicking the "national law" link in the wiki article that you guys list