The Bookie

Excessive commenter on numerous unrelated topics.

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

THE best series I've ever seen and a remarkably accurate production of the book. James Clavell would be thrilled (RIP James)

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR It was published by a team of academic and field experts working from Harvard University

It's impossible to get more official and scientific than that. It was published in over 30 top tier academic journals and got sterling peer review

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

So, what specifically do you think is off?

Do you think scientists are fabricating the DNA evidence?

That seems terrifically unlikely for several reasons. There were several Hindus working with David Reich. Vagheesh M. Narasimhan was the primary author and Kumarasamy Thangaraj was a primary contributor

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR There is unassailable DNA proof

And there term Aryan long predated Nazis

Indians have a very hard time distinguishing between objective and subjective

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR What evidence do you have that this is true?

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

Straw man argument

According to Christian religious texts and oral traditions, the earth is 7,000 or so years old and that's obviously not true. Moreover, this isn't an entirely Euro thing. Every scientist and geneticist outside of India subscribes to this, as do just geneticists in India because it's beyond dispute.

Ever wonder why higher caste Indians tend to look more Euro? Because they ARE more Euro

99% of Europeans couldn't care less about the AIT debate. Even white supremacists really don't care what happened in far away India 3,500 years ago

Do you have any evidence beyond oral traditions and religious texts?

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR So your only evidence is religious Hindu texts and oral tradition?

This isn't science or reason. It's religion and believing what makes you feel good as Hindu

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR You're blunt assertions haven't shown anything. That's why they're called blunt assertions... there's no evidence provided

I'm not just asking you to take me word on this because I say so. I'm providing evidence

What evidence do you have of a Himalayan origin from 7,000bc?

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@Kittenwaffin You'd think they'd learn

https://t.co/mlpZ2K9hXo

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@Steve_Sailer Great article

This seems like an adapt or be crushed issue, like iron technology, industrialization, etc. It's inevitable that some folks will utilize this and they will become a ruling caste

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@alpharivelino @PerellClips @david_perell All of the greatest art in history was highly derivative. Michelangelo, Raphael, and Divinci knew and learned from one another in Florence. Ditto the Dutch school, French painters of the same period, etc

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

You're just making blunt assertions, presumably because you don't like what the evidence says. Indian men always talk like this...just blunt assertions with no evidence

What exactly is your dispute with the data? You're certainly unfamiliar with it

What is your evidence for a Himalayan origin in around 7,000bc?

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@Neo1229591 He's likely her sugar daddy

White women only marry Indians when they're rich and she's been run through by 500 other men

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

That is not true, and recent DNA evidence proves this. They originated on the Pontic Caspien steppes and only started expanding outwards, into Europe, in 3,200 bc. They didn't reach India until around 1,500 bc (there were a few, smaller IE migrations into India that dated back to 2,000 bc)

There was 0 IE DNA in India prior to 2,000bc and 0 Dravidian DNA beyond India

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@JkingTier1 @SamirDeshp62024 @Jijith_NR To where?

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

@TaliaGraceSable Women are right to see this as a plus. It's not only the ability to support a good life (and money is the cause of most relationship problems), it's the fact that he wins; that he's outcompeting others

[Iberian America @Iberianamerica]

To date Latinas, you gotta be Romantic ❤️

Here some loving nicknames in Spanish 👇

Personally, I prefer calling my Latina gf "puta loca." It means "sweetheart" 🥰

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

This is why the manosphere is so doom and gloom about dating. 75% of their audience is made up of incels, who want to hear that their problems with women are universal and rooted in women's nature

I'm going to kick something the next time I hear how "Hypergamy" means that women are cheaters by nature

[The Bookie @Garlicoyal]

We need to bring back peer pressure on 13-18 year old boys to get dates to school dances and for regular dating. I'm convinced that this is at the heart of the problem

Previous generations of boys (like me, as was) had to force themselves to ask girls out. We'd get rejected sometimes but learned to get back up and try again. We learned what girls liked and didn't like about us, and that women weren't terrifying and majestic creatures

Men in their 20s now see rejection as a humiliation ritual and can't bring themselves to engage, like someone scared of heights who refuses to cross a bridge and learn that it's not dangerous