@JkingTier1@SamirDeshp62024@Jijith_NR There is unassailable DNA proof
And there term Aryan long predated Nazis
Indians have a very hard time distinguishing between objective and subjective
Straw man argument
According to Christian religious texts and oral traditions, the earth is 7,000 or so years old and that's obviously not true. Moreover, this isn't an entirely Euro thing. Every scientist and geneticist outside of India subscribes to this, as do just geneticists in India because it's beyond dispute.
Ever wonder why higher caste Indians tend to look more Euro? Because they ARE more Euro
99% of Europeans couldn't care less about the AIT debate. Even white supremacists really don't care what happened in far away India 3,500 years ago
Do you have any evidence beyond oral traditions and religious texts?
@JkingTier1@SamirDeshp62024@Jijith_NR So your only evidence is religious Hindu texts and oral tradition?
This isn't science or reason. It's religion and believing what makes you feel good as Hindu
@JkingTier1@SamirDeshp62024@Jijith_NR You're blunt assertions haven't shown anything. That's why they're called blunt assertions... there's no evidence provided
I'm not just asking you to take me word on this because I say so. I'm providing evidence
What evidence do you have of a Himalayan origin from 7,000bc?
@Steve_Sailer Great article
This seems like an adapt or be crushed issue, like iron technology, industrialization, etc. It's inevitable that some folks will utilize this and they will become a ruling caste
@alpharivelino@PerellClips@david_perell All of the greatest art in history was highly derivative. Michelangelo, Raphael, and Divinci knew and learned from one another in Florence. Ditto the Dutch school, French painters of the same period, etc
You're just making blunt assertions, presumably because you don't like what the evidence says. Indian men always talk like this...just blunt assertions with no evidence
What exactly is your dispute with the data? You're certainly unfamiliar with it
What is your evidence for a Himalayan origin in around 7,000bc?
That is not true, and recent DNA evidence proves this. They originated on the Pontic Caspien steppes and only started expanding outwards, into Europe, in 3,200 bc. They didn't reach India until around 1,500 bc (there were a few, smaller IE migrations into India that dated back to 2,000 bc)
There was 0 IE DNA in India prior to 2,000bc and 0 Dravidian DNA beyond India
@TaliaGraceSable Women are right to see this as a plus. It's not only the ability to support a good life (and money is the cause of most relationship problems), it's the fact that he wins; that he's outcompeting others
To date Latinas, you gotta be Romantic ❤️
Here some loving nicknames in Spanish 👇
Personally, I prefer calling my Latina gf "puta loca." It means "sweetheart" 🥰
This is why the manosphere is so doom and gloom about dating. 75% of their audience is made up of incels, who want to hear that their problems with women are universal and rooted in women's nature
I'm going to kick something the next time I hear how "Hypergamy" means that women are cheaters by nature
We need to bring back peer pressure on 13-18 year old boys to get dates to school dances and for regular dating. I'm convinced that this is at the heart of the problem
Previous generations of boys (like me, as was) had to force themselves to ask girls out. We'd get rejected sometimes but learned to get back up and try again. We learned what girls liked and didn't like about us, and that women weren't terrifying and majestic creatures
Men in their 20s now see rejection as a humiliation ritual and can't bring themselves to engage, like someone scared of heights who refuses to cross a bridge and learn that it's not dangerous
Can't tell if you're joking
90% of Indian men/white women arrangements are with a rich Indian and a thrice divorced white lady, a trailer trash girl, or something along those lines
White women are less likely to match with Indian men on dating apps than with men of any other race