Garth the Green

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@PopilioLenate @pwhhjr God imbued His image into a pair of our ancestors that were born out of non-bearers of his image

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@corsaren Would you say that expiation as a benefit for the perpetrator falls under 1? Cause I would say that is one of the most important features

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@cath_menarion Almost word for word lmao

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@MadocCairns Yeah obviously, here I’m talking about the twitter “”thomist”” type

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@MadocCairns I agree that racists in general believe them but the “tradcath” style ones tend to be very careful in how they talk about these topics in order not to say anything explicitly unorthodox in my experience. They probably would say that they disagree with these specific statements

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@SimonSimplicio Lumen Gentium 14: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.”

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@SimonSimplicio Besides the opposite would be weird. Would God force one that willingly and with enough knowledge rejects him and his will to union with him? This seems an override on our freedom

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@SimonSimplicio As far as I know the “culpably reject” part is dogma per at least two EC (Florence and V2). Idk how you could reject that. But you can have a variety of views about what “culpability” entails (and this is too decontextualised to know what Joe believes about it)

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@marcojaujc @StefanFrancisci I think it was Xi originally

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@King_Crackers @vatican2spirit All due respect but it matters a lot. If it really happened it means that God performed an abortion (which would then be ok to do since God cannot do evil). Otherwise it just tells us about the belief of some medieval Irish catholic (which can almost safely be dismissed)

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@crawlings13 Isn’t that dogma as per V2 and Florence? (I mean the latter phrase)

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@xue948738946967 @StefanFrancisci Yeah it’s based on that meme (in this case it’s derogatory though). Memes don’t need sourcing lmao

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@bequietplease_b @marcojaujc @StefanFrancisci I mean the first instance (with Xi) was not ironic. The adoption for Meloni is since in this case “doing nothing” is a negative trait

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@marcojaujc @StefanFrancisci It’s a riff on another meme, it’s ironic

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@n1passer @DavidRland The “suffer even more” carries, I believe, an implicit “more than the heteros”. As I understand the tweet it implicitly already brings up heterosexual obligations, which, as an unmarried young man, I don’t believe to be much easier. That’s why I mentioned them

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@DrFrancisYoung Canon law is in large part not of divine origin even in theory, it’s different from the law which in theory only comes from God’s covenant

[Garth the Green @GarthTheGreen]

@de_la_paz_owo What do you mean for “lgbt-affirming”? This could be either really based or borderline heretical