Giraffe

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@jimcjin @OccupyDemocrats Hahaha! An American without a grasp of history! The French were pivotal in the American Revolutionary War, the French financed, and provided major supplies to the revolutionary army. The French were essentially one of your earliest allies. The American school system needs work!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@NwaebePrecious @unitedpeoplestv @grok how long did Edwin Van Da Sar go without conceding in all competitions during the 08/09 season when he broke the Premier League record for most minutes without conceding?

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@juza_23 @grok has a team won their first 5 Premier league games then gone on to lose 5 in a row after?

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@Normbulance @DarrigoMelanie Because those salaries might be NYC centric, yes, you could earn €5m in NYC, but the same job else where would be €4m, thus you would take a €420k loss after taxes just to not pay €80k. Seems counter productive!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@ChickzWithKickz @Utd__Agenda Either the idiot that posted it, or they are just peddling fake news to gain clicks!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@redmancdesigns1 @AlternativeMUFC

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@Farmall140A @sirDukeDevin But you guys drink the koolaid and lap up his dumb rhetoric. You are all sheep!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@Farmall140A @sirDukeDevin People dont understand economics, MAGAnomics tells you that the US is running at a trade deficit on goods of €122bn but what it doesn't tell is that it runs a trade surplus on services of $276bn. So you blindly believe Trump, but he and his party are flat out wrong!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@stannny71 @krassenstein @MrAustinRogers Precisely targeted tariffs are good for an economy, i.e. if a country has a well established industry, they will set tariffs on that specific industry to make it more expensive to import, thus protecting said industry. Blanket tariffs are incredibly stupid and damage importers.

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@varunrdeshpande @AmorimEra_ 1. The issue in the original statement (not so much yours) is the issue with "fees paid", without knowing the cash structure of the deals, we are unable to determine this.

Thus, the Zirkzee statement is incorrect, or the other players "fees" are incorrect.

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@varunrdeshpande @AmorimEra_ I have to disagree with you for this, if you're talking about transfer fees it does not matter the length of installments, if youre talking P&L impact then all have to be amortised over the length of their contract. It is likely that all those transfers are paid in instalments.

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@jigneshpaniwala @abhraneelsinha @AmorimEra_ The trnsfer fee is the trnsfer. Just because it's paid over a length of time doesn't change it. Cash impact is completely different from P&L impact. Amortisation works for all transfers. Utd are paying all transfer fees in installments, and that is why transfer debt is high.

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@centredevils @TelegraphDucker It is a non-story! It is cash flow. Whether you pay a transfer fee upfront or over time, it has the same impact on the P&L. Transfer fees are amortised over the length of the initial contract. The issue is the fees paid are over the top not that the money is owed!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@Grahamblythe4 @CBSSportsGolazo @Carra23 @MicahRichards Or the Premier League winner and Jamie!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@UtdEIIis The biggest issue is the wages, there is probably a budget of £x transfer + £y in wages and because Man Utd pay inflated wages that has to be a consideration. That is probably why we cannot sell as high as others!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@tedio74 @SkySportsNews To be fair to Skysports, they can't, as they haven't made any!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@danhayes85 @Cantona_Collars Evra, there is an argument to be had, and you'd more than likely be wrong, however, Shaw vs Irwin isn't even a contest. Irwin was in a different league!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@Joe24599184 Jeepers, you need to calm down! What does it matter if he actuals performs? It's not that deep. 1. You don't know the full picture, and 2. I bet you celebrate if he bangs one in against City or Liverpool!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@TayWH5 @SuhailChowdhary @UtdFaithfuls It's nothing to do with FFP, it's to do with the cash transaction, someone correct me if I'm wrong but a release clause has to be paid upfront, this way the cash can be spread meaning they don't have to use credit, which may have interest charges above the £2.5m extra!

[Giraffe @garthym1]

@bcampbell23 @MAGAtsAreInbr3d @sim3744 @suhcmeknuhts A lot of footballers are getting wiser to it and are beginning to refuse to sign football shirts if they don't believe it is for a fan! It's happening more and more!