The benchmark I care about for coding agents isn’t “can it generate the code?”
It’s: can the system take a messy objective through implementation, testing, review and verification—and leave the repo in a state you’d actually maintain?
The demo is generation.
The product is delivery.
If an agent can act without waiting for you, it needs a way to prove what it did without asking you to trust its own story.
That’s the part of autonomy I think gets underestimated.
Execution gets cheaper.
Verification becomes more valuable.
One agent making a bad assumption is a bug.
Ten agents inheriting the same bad assumption is a systems failure.
That’s why scaling agent count without scaling coordination and verification can make the system worse, not better.
Autonomy amplifies architecture—good and bad.
@ManusAI@Red_Xiao_ I paid $2,195.00 for 5M promotional credits on August 26th. I checked yesterday and my balance dropped from 7.5M to 2.9M—4.6M credits gone. Nowhere in the purchase process was it clearly disclosed that I would lose these credits and I did not spend these credits.
Your support has been absolutely terrible: what appears to be an AI bot masquerading as a human refuses to escalate and resolve the issue. I expect transparent support and accountability. Restore my credits.
Agent memory isn’t chat history.
For autonomous software work, the durable state is decisions, requirements, evidence, failures, approvals and why the plan changed.
That state can’t disappear because a context window rolled over.
Memory is infrastructure.
I think prompts are becoming the wrong abstraction for serious autonomous software work.
A prompt is an instruction.
An objective is a destination.
Give the system an objective, constraints and verification criteria—then let it plan the path while proving the critical transitions.
That’s closer to how I’m designing Legatus.
@Trace_Cohen I’d build a custom connector so Muse can send tasks to Claude Code, track progress, and get results back. They stay separate agents, but share context and hand off actual work instead of passing notes in a Google Doc. DM me—happy to build it.
Hey Froody! Thank you for your question. Legatus Terminal Pane (LTP) helps you see what Claude Code is doing without digging through terminal output—and control what it’s allowed to do. You get a visual workspace, built-in IDE tools, and an enterprise rules engine that enforces your team’s development policies right inside the Claude Code CLI.
Independent verification changes how you build the whole agent system.
If completion has to be proven, you stop optimizing for impressive output and start designing around evidence:
What was required?
What changed?
What tested it?
Who—or what—verified it?
That’s a much healthier definition of “done.”