@johnofgauntlet Agreed and likewise.
If you are so inclined, I would encourage you to delve deeper into the primary reason for the white man's historical greatness, and what also heralded the turning point of the current decay in the West.
@johnofgauntlet I think you mean civil liberties, but yeah, your civil liberties get cut off when you murder someone.
The fact that murder is considered worthy of such a penalty is enforced morality.
This is no different if you accept a zygote as a person, hence it is the crux of the issue.
@johnofgauntlet It's moral relativism to say, "I think abortion is wrong, but I think the state wielding power is worse. So I choose abortion."
I think that it is a good thing if the state upholds the moral law of God (what this great country was based on btw)
@johnofgauntlet INB4 "what about rape and incest"
For this miniscule minority, it represents a tragedy, but 2 wrongs don't make a right and that child still deserves a chance at life.
@johnofgauntlet There you go again with the moral relativism.
Once again in the *vast* majority of cases, women who get an abortion are running from the consequences of their actions.
They are not being "forced" to do anything except to accept said consequence.
The state can put me in jail
@johnofgauntlet Have you ever stopped to consider that OBYNs who are making a fuss about not being able to do abortions (Hypocratic oath violation btw), might be ideologically compromised?
Plenty of doctors were telling me to get a certain shot or grandma might die a few years ago.
@DavidFo25871896@JohnLeFevre It really is such an existential threat that the judiciary has been slowly corrupted against law abiding people in favor of criminals.
@johnofgauntlet I mean that killing humans has a unique weight (obviously), hence why it is so important to determine the status of the zygote's personhood.
When does it stop being on par with an animal? I would posit that it's impossible to make such a distinction.
@johnofgauntlet Also, I am glad that you are talking like a normal person now, but that argument is also complete propaganda.
Disregarding the fact that it's generously .1% of abortions that happen in that context (probably way less), induced birth and c-section already exist.
@johnofgauntlet Why would it be morally wrong whatsover if the zygote isn't a person? It either is or it isn't, and if it is, then it's murder to kill intentionally.
@johnofgauntlet My thought leader is Jesus Christ, and this is one of those issues where He's pretty clear.
And, you are no better than a black person acquitting a guilty brotha because justice is just something yt made up.
Enjoy your moral relativism.
@johnofgauntlet Brother, I just looked at your account and saw that your main thing appears to be agressive race realism. So, what the hell are you doing arguing so vehemently for abortion like a dyed in the wool shitlib?
@johnofgauntlet Pro-baby murder advocates have nothing but emotional and ideological arguments to support their position.
If you want any further proof, just read back through this thread.
@johnofgauntlet Pro-baby murder advocates have nothing but emotional and ideological arguments to support their position.
If you want any further proof, just read back through this thread.
@johnofgauntlet Pro-baby murder advocates have nothing but emotional and ideological arguments to support their position.
If you want any further proof, just read back through this thread.
@spookysecretguy@MadderomMichael@ctflyerfan4@jonatanpallesen@MattWalshBlog Good to know that you think people are only worthy of dignity if they are wanted.
Why would "bodily autonomy" trump a child's right to live?
You either think it's murder or you don't. It taking place in the womb doesn't change that fact.
@johnofgauntlet No, now you are ducking😂
See, I said you have to answer or I win, so that actually double cancels out your statement of such and now you are on the duck clock.
Checkmate bucko🙀