rainbow ᯓ★

⌞♱ god is a woman ♱⌝

[it’s bee | 🐝 @pipachel]

so you're telling me that taylor swift, who once was on the cover of times magazine as one of the women who broke the silence and launched the #metoo movement, invited a wife beater and abuser to her wedding???

[jemi @privatemanor]

okay, now that i have slept and composed myself, here is what i thought about the air. of all 3 stories that FB have played, it is the weakest of them all and the trope-iest of them all. following damsel in distress trope and forced proximity, one of the cheesiest trope out there

[dilys @DilysDgc]

@milanjkrs But they're not masc, they're fems in a suit. And the problems is not a fem wearing a suit, it's the fact the the cousins are all the "top", the providers ans the ones using tuxedos, making it seem like there is a "man" in the relationship. I hope for masc rep, but this is not it

[franchealafanatic @ohmybananaz]

Bridgerton please let Francheala do this but on a pianoooo

[Lizzy @Ormlycia]

THE ultimate femme x femme couple

[josie ‎⚢ @bbeegirIs]

i love to see lesbians happy…one day it will be me

[sapphics like: @sapphicslike]

whoremembers

[sapphics like: @sapphicslike]

hashtag need that

[uppity* air/ewb era @thisisuma]

My bad op, I finally got what you mean. This post was lowkey vague plus the pics didn't help but yes the dynamics between the cousins and their wives have been a bit heteronormative

[rainbow ᯓ★ @gayuser5]

The only good part of that show. 🤌

I just hope their next project has a much better story same goes for EngLot. They're both GL icons and seeing companies use them to push something that feels so off is honestly disappointing.

[Lesbocine @lesbocine]

elas conseguem se superar a cada ano

THE AIR FINAL EPISODE
#เสน่หาวาโยตอนจบ

[no one @shay_notlaccin]

I think this discourse around the heteronormative agenda displayed in these gls shows just how important it is to have educated queer women involved in the production of these shows. This top/bottom, uke/seme shit has done sm damage.

[rainbow ᯓ★ @gayuser5]

@FBlowkey It's not about the clothes. It's about the promotion and how some fans pushed heteronormative gender roles like they're the default in GL.

This account should be cancelled for being happy with this kind of comments and hype it up like this

https://t.co/164quwHkhM

[🏳️‍🌈HB-K🌷🦦 @H_B_KYE]

ขออนุญาตแปลตรงนี้ให้อินเตอร์แฟนค่ะ

CH7 Fans : "If there really is a new project, I hope Freen gets to play the leading role again. Drama fans are already hooked on her leading-man vibe. With Becky as the beautiful and talented leading lady by her side, the ratings will definitely skyrocket."

[emy : y si si? @inloveneen]

entiendo que la ropa no tiene género y jamás he dicho que las mujeres no deban usar traje. ese no es el punto.

lo que me parece curioso es que, en muchas producciones, justamente las personajes que son vistas o presentadas como tops son las que terminan usando traje, mientras que las bottoms suelen llevar vestido o un estilo mucho más femenino. cuando ese patrón se repite una y otra vez, es normal preguntarse si se está cayendo en el mismo estereotipo de siempre.

durante años, la representación heteronormativa nos acostumbró a ver al hombre con traje y a la mujer con vestido. por eso, cuando en parejas sáficas se replica constantemente esa misma estética, es válido cuestionar si, de manera consciente o no, se siguen asignando roles visuales similares.

no estoy diciendo que usar traje esté mal ni que una top no pueda usarlo. lo que cuestiono es que parezca ser casi el "uniforme" de las tops, mientras que a las bottoms se les encasilla en una imagen más femenina. la representación también consiste en mostrar variedad: tops femeninas, bottoms masculinas, mujeres que usan traje porque les gusta y no porque ese look tenga que representar un rol dentro de la relación.

al final, la crítica no es contra el traje; es contra el estereotipo que se crea cuando siempre se asocia la misma ropa con el mismo rol.

[NOELLE 👠 ชน์ @raychelltwt]

none of these women alot of Thai gls put in suits are actually masculine and it's fine for them to wear suits but when its used to push the very obvious top=masc, suit and bottom=fem, dress agenda itss soooo shdgshahfnhdjndc maybe let's start with hiring actual masc women first

[rainbow ᯓ★ @gayuser5]

@NodaReacciona What I saw wasn't butch representation, it was a male-coded dynamic.
They were calling them husbands and wives and it's disgusting to see their fandoms love the narrative

[dilys @DilysDgc]

I feel like this is the simplest way of putting what I wanted to say all along, its not the more important thing to me the use of suits or if a character is masc of fem presenting (we do need more masc and butches) but the roles the use of these can sugest and reinforce

[keke 2.0💤 @chooset0change]

ngl you immediately lose my respect if you think women knowing how to kiss like they actually desire each other, or portraying lesbian intimacy and sex in a gl is inherently “pornographic.” that says far more about how you view queer intimacy.