@dcmscienceondog We should petition the gov’t to look into this, as it may just making us pawns in an elaborate scheme to discredit competing businesses. https://t.co/6R8HFGFFYw
@dcmscienceondog I also read that the study wasn’t peer reviewed and thus scientifically invalidated. There are also reports that the consultants for the research are clearly biased, as they have ties to grain inclusive pet food makers like Hill’s and Purina.
@dcmscienceondog True. And they’re not even just nuances but clear inconsistencies. I mean, why would the FDA condition pet owners against grain free by releasing a list of brands when its findings don’t support any correlation?
@survivormary @laurissann I know it hasn’t done that formally, but it’s almost like the agency is telling us that. This is why I also think this FDA report is biased and tainted, and deserves to be investigated for alleged conflict of interest and collusion. https://t.co/KUUMRfv3zd
@survivormary @laurissann Indeed. All that the FDA did it was to start a frenzy. People will tend to notice only the brand listing, not the actual findings. If the agency can’t even come up with something definitive to link grain free and DCM, why is it still suggesting a brand switch?
@terrible_tomas@NUTROBrand@BlueCheese you might find the article below helpful. Good that you’re asking, as a lot of pet owners are just panicking and campaigning against grain-free for no reason. Cheers. https://t.co/3tRh2dVeo8
A new petition urging employers to recognise pet bereavement has been started – do you think that the loss of a pet should be recognised in the workplace?
Going out as a conservative for Halloween. I'm going to tell at every kid for taking candy handouts and not working to contribute to society. Get a job kids!