@QiaochuYuan@ascetic_shadow I strongly recommend attending a quaker meeting for worship that does waiting/unprogrammed worship at least once. ideally also stick around to chat to friends afterwards.
(caveat: I've never been to a meeting in the US; it may be a very different vibe from UK / Aus / NZ / .)
@diviacaroline (also fwiw @natural_hazard may have a more informed opinion on whether the structured viz scaffolding is just 'parts work with a spicy ontology + extra bullshit' vs a diff thing, as I tried to cover the core skill via a long text convo last year (tho with caveats & adjustments).
@diviacaroline yeah, changes to dreams seem anecdotally common (& I'm v curious about mechanisms there). is your sense that the "dreams are doing processing that I endorse" thing happened after you started doing a bunch of parts work, or has that always been the case, or...?
@diviacaroline hard to fully explain in short-form tweet, but the tl;dr is: structured visualisation for dialoguing with aspects of your psychology and/or your simulated model of another person; adjacent to what I'd now call "parts work" or something, albeit very much not from that tradition.
interesting! this is so far from my own experience of dreams and "seems like good processing is happening here"-shaped brain stuff.
from the age of ~10–22, I had one recurring nightmare—which had no overtly disturbing content but viscerally very upsetting—but then I learned a specific processing/introspection skill, and that removed almost all positive & negative affect from my dreams (inc the recurring one) as an unexpected side-effect.
@diviacaroline lol wait ok but
1. are nightmares common enough (and sleep-context-sensitive enough) in genpop that this kind of advice might be truth-tracking?
2. if you ~like a dream, in what sense is it a 'nightmare'? (if you're not disturbed or upset or bothered isn't it just a vivid dream?)
cf esperanto, which dissolves the cost of a noun/verb distinction but also optimises so hard for these taken-to-be- neutral grammatical categories that it in all instances you use a 'category-neutral root' with a mandatory terminal vowel acting as the type assignment operator.
@natural_hazard if 'country' = 'the nation-state as a whole' → no
if 'country' ≈ 'a [narrower-than-nation] cluster of specific ecological niches, geographical regions, communities, & lifeways' → yes
@HiFromMichaelV [speaking as a "reading paradise lost changed my life when I was an 18y/o" girlie—] i'm pretty sure this this is just a "what's your dissociation style" quiz
@AnnaWSalamon I very strongly share this sentiment. I really hope that this publication turns out to decrease the veering-away-ness. But I don't usually expect that a book—even a bestseller—will do the kind "big global conversation nudging/improving" that I feel is so desperately needed here.