FYH

if you can find your country on this GDP map, then you are lucky

[FYH @gdpfirst]

@prao_d @aliahd66 1. You asked a very fundamental question, what is ”china limited aim”. Actually it is quite simple if you read below carefully: among China geopolitical challenge priority around China boarder, India is only the 5th. 1st is Taiwan (USA) https://t.co/7r8UHsS8Cs

[0x鸣人 @LuBtc888]

为什么在中国一个县城，一年收上来的税是4.14亿，

但光给体制内发工资就要26亿，缺口是自身税收的六倍。

这不是哪个穷到极端的个例，而是中国绝大多数普通县城真实的运转底色。

只不过平时这种脆弱被满街的豪车和高值的楼盘给掩盖了，不仔细看你根本看不见。

偏偏这两年，越来越多在大城市被房租和裁员压得喘不过气的年轻人，开始动同一个念头，

要不要干脆回县城算了？

这里面，到底正在发生着什么？

[FYH @gdpfirst]

wo

[墓碑科技 @mubeitech]

麻省理工（MIT）的教授吉尔伯特·斯特朗（Gilbert Strang），教了半个世纪的微积分。
临别前，他没给学生留下一座题海。
他录了五段极短的视频，把厚如砖头的教科书，直接碾成了两组词。

从1962年起，他就在这块黑板上写公式。
他太清楚普通人是怎么在数学里迷路的。
翻开教材，全是一道接一道的死题，全是细节。
这门学科的大图景呢？没人看得清。
于是他决定亲手替学生扒开迷雾。

他不讲天书，他只讲常识。
微积分到底是什么？
斯特朗说：它就是两个函数之间的关系。

第一组词：距离与速度。
你在开车，仪表盘上的总里程，是第一个函数。
你踩油门时的时速，是第二个函数。
知道里程的变化，去求当下的时速，这就叫微分。

第二组词：海拔与斜率。
你在爬山，当前的海拔高度，是第一个函数。
你脚下踩着的那块岩石有多陡，是第二个函数。

微积分的魔力在于，这条路是双向的。
顺着走，叫微分；倒着走，叫积分。
斯特朗举了个绝妙的例子。
老电影里，熊孩子偷开老爸的跑车出去狂飙，里程表爆表。
为了消灭证据，熊孩子把车架起来，挂倒挡，死踩油门，指望里程表倒着转。
这在微积分里叫什么？
距离在减少，这就是负斜率，负速度。
斯特朗调侃：如果造汽车的工程师懂点微积分，时速表就该设个零下刻度。

再往下走，就是这门学科真正的奇迹。
假设你一脚油门踩到底，速度稳步飙升。
在图纸上，速度画出来是一条斜向上的直线。
这时候，你到底开出去了多远？
不用背死公式。
去看那条速度线底下的面积。
一个最简单的三角形，它的面积，就是你走过的真实距离。
一条线的面积，等于另一条线的高度。
这就是积分的本质。

教了五十多年，斯特朗最后留下的没有炫技，没有居高临下的刁难。
你看不到什么刻意制造的门槛，也听不到什么弯道超车的黑话。
他只是站在常识上，把人类最高深的学问拆解成一辆车、一座山。

[油爆琵琶拌着面🇨🇳 @zmx8067]

記住他們的名字：衣昕玉、程龍

2025年8月11日在🇨🇳中國南海，執行海上維權行動中英勇犧牲，被追認為中國共產黨黨員。🙏

我們必須立即行動起來，絕不能讓悲劇再次發生！🤔

[China view @Chinaview0022]

Anthropic 的 CEO 看着中国推出一个新的 AI 模型，在所有方面都超越了 Claude Opus 4.8，性能媲美 Fable 5，成本却低了 8 倍，而且还是 100% 开源，他对此却无能为力

[李总财经 @Boqll5Tppdalvtw]

K3之后模型再无护城河。

Kimi-K3如果排行榜是真的，说明一件事：大模型之间差异会越来越小。

OpenAI的GPT、Anthropic的Claude模型也没有什么护城河，那么他们的万亿市值叙事根本就不成立。

你领先半年别人几个月就追上来了。后面可能就是价格战了，谁便宜用谁。

Ai模型公司可能才是真正的周期股。还是按月的周期。

[软苏格拉底 @Graceruansu]

早上来办公室听到一个惊天大瓜

我一个女同事，96年的

她跟老板出差，说特殊期喝不了酒，老板不同意，没办法她就喝了一点

结束后返程在车上，老板居然批评她，说她拿这事当幌子

我那同事也不解释，直接把姨妈巾抽出来

一边炸毛一边问老板，你看啊，你看啊···

当时司机和老板都傻眼了

感觉这女孩以后老板再也不敢惹了

太牛逼了

[FYH @gdpfirst]

Survey after survey…….

[FYH @gdpfirst]

71.74

[Kelly_Zee_Wolf @ZeeWolfPatriot]

@Aviation_Intel Yeah.. But you and I both know, Russia and Ukraine drones have made tanks our generations "Battle Ship".. Soon to be phased off/out the battle field(coming from a proud father of 3 Army 1st Cav sons) #ScoutsOut

[FYH @gdpfirst]

Washington is seeking to make India and other countries bear the economic costs of a European conflict while the U.S. and its allies continue to buy from Russia whatever they deem essential.

[Dr. Brahma Chellaney @Chellaney]

Making India Pay for Europe's War

The goal of U.S. sanctions against Moscow under successive American presidents has been to inflict maximum damage on Russia's economy while minimizing collateral damage to the U.S. and its closest treaty allies. Trump and the current Congress continue to hew to that approach.

India bore the brunt of the oil sanctions Trump previously imposed on Russia, even though New Delhi has never been the largest or second-largest buyer of Russian energy (China ranks first and Europe second). Washington's objective has been to compel India to shift from Russian energy to American supplies.

To a considerable extent, Washington has already succeeded: within months, the U.S. became India's largest supplier of LNG and LPG. India is also now the largest export destination for Venezuelan oil, payments for which flow to the U.S. Treasury rather than Caracas.

Trump coordinated his Russian energy sanctions with Europe, granting European states a comfortable transition period to phase out Russian gas imports by early 2028.

Now the bipartisan bill in the U.S. Senate, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026, follows the same logic. It exempts America's treaty allies while seeking to target India, China (which has long sidestepped or circumvented U.S. sanctions), Slovakia, Hungary and Azerbaijan with tariffs of up to 100%. It also exempts the U.S., which continues to rely on Russia for enriched uranium to fuel its domestic nuclear reactors.

Today, even as the Western bloc wages a proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, it continues to pour far more money into Russia's coffers than India ever has through its own purchases of Russian resources — from LNG and piped gas to enriched uranium, fertilizers, and precious metals such as palladium and platinum.

Put simply, Washington is seeking to make India and other countries bear the economic costs of a European conflict while the U.S. and its allies continue to buy from Russia whatever they deem essential.

[Dr. Brahma Chellaney @Chellaney]

Making India Pay for Europe's War

The goal of U.S. sanctions against Moscow under successive American presidents has been to inflict maximum damage on Russia's economy while minimizing collateral damage to the U.S. and its closest treaty allies. Trump and the current Congress continue to hew to that approach.

India bore the brunt of the oil sanctions Trump previously imposed on Russia, even though New Delhi has never been the largest or second-largest buyer of Russian energy (China ranks first and Europe second). Washington's objective has been to compel India to shift from Russian energy to American supplies.

To a considerable extent, Washington has already succeeded: within months, the U.S. became India's largest supplier of LNG and LPG. India is also now the largest export destination for Venezuelan oil, payments for which flow to the U.S. Treasury rather than Caracas.

Trump coordinated his Russian energy sanctions with Europe, granting European states a comfortable transition period to phase out Russian gas imports by early 2028.

Now the bipartisan bill in the U.S. Senate, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026, follows the same logic. It exempts America's treaty allies while seeking to target India, China (which has long sidestepped or circumvented U.S. sanctions), Slovakia, Hungary and Azerbaijan with tariffs of up to 100%. It also exempts the U.S., which continues to rely on Russia for enriched uranium to fuel its domestic nuclear reactors.

Today, even as the Western bloc wages a proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, it continues to pour far more money into Russia's coffers than India ever has through its own purchases of Russian resources — from LNG and piped gas to enriched uranium, fertilizers, and precious metals such as palladium and platinum.

Put simply, Washington is seeking to make India and other countries bear the economic costs of a European conflict while the U.S. and its allies continue to buy from Russia whatever they deem essential.

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

菲律宾🇵🇭的地理“红线”
如果把1898年的《巴黎条约》看作一份百年前的“房产过户合同”，那么当时的“卖家”西班牙和“买家”美国，就用一条鲜红的折线，在菲律宾群岛上划下了一道极其苛刻的“购房红线”。

这条红线不仅框定了菲律宾的版图，更在不经意间，留下了一个连今天的菲律宾都无法跨越的“法理护城河”。

🔍 核心禁区：“红线”外的世界
这条“红线”的划定极其讲究，它形成了一个闭合的多边形，其中最关键的两个坐标是：
* 🧭 西界：死死钉在东经118°经线上，宛如一道不可逾越的“叹息之墙”。
* 🧭 北界：牢牢卡在北纬20°纬线上，半步也不许向北越雷池一步。
💥 三大“漏网之鱼”的尴尬处境
正是因为这两条铁律，导致有三个重要的地理区域尴尬地落在了这条“红线”之外：
1. 🏝️ 黄岩岛：被西界“拒之门外”黄岩岛位于东经117°51′，正好乖乖待在东经118°以西的“红线”外。这意味着，在百年前的国际条约中，它压根儿就不算菲律宾的“法定财产”。
2. 🏝️ 巴丹群岛：被北界“挡在门外”位于菲律宾最北端的巴丹群岛，其核心区域整体处于北纬20°线以北。根据条约，它们也被明确排除在了西班牙割让的领土范围之外。
3. 🏝️ 巴拉望岛西侧：被西南角“切了一刀”红线在西南角的拐点精准地卡在了巴拉望岛的西侧，这意味着巴拉望岛虽被划入版图，但其西侧广阔的海域和岛礁却被无情地“切”了出去。

⚖️ 法理启示：历史不会说谎
这张历史地图就像一面镜子，照出了百年前的法理真相。条约白纸黑字，边界清晰无疑。菲律宾试图通过国内立法单方面将这些“漏网之鱼”纳入怀里的做法，在国际法上是站不住脚的。

历史的经纬已经给出了明确的答案，中国对这些区域拥有无可争辩的主权和充分的历史法理依据。任何试图篡改历史、混淆视听的行为，在铁证如山的事实面前，都不过是徒劳的挣扎罢了。

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

1879年浙江巡抚谭钟麟午睡之后，路过通房丫头卧室时与之发生关系，而就是这一次丫头便怀了孕，一年后生下一子，便是后来大名鼎鼎的风云人物：谭延闿。

1879年的杭州暑热难耐，浙江巡抚谭钟麟用过午饭，歪在书房的凉榻上歇了一个晌，醒来时他独自沿着游廊慢慢踱步。行至后院角落一间耳房门前，隔着竹帘隐隐听见里面有动静。

这屋里住的是府里一个通房丫头，姓李，原籍河北，自幼被卖进府中，平日里寡言少语，只默默做些贴身的零碎活计。

谭钟麟那天不知是午睡初醒的一时迷怔，还是那暑气蒸得人心里浮躁，竟随手掀了帘子进去。李丫头见是老爷，慌忙起身请安，手足无措地立在一旁。这一进去，便有了片刻的温存。

事情过去也就过去了，谭钟麟并没有太放在心上，他那时已年近花甲，仕宦生涯阅人无数，府中姬妾丫鬟也不止一个，这不过像是长夏午后的一片微澜，转眼就归于沉寂。

谁知那片微澜底下，竟悄悄凝成了一粒种子。几个月后，李丫头身子渐渐起了变化，吃不下饭，时常干呕。府里的大夫一请脉，连忙给太太们道喜——这丫鬟竟有了身孕。正室夫人脸色自然不大好看，但谭钟麟倒没有嫌弃，只是淡淡说了句：“既然怀了，便好生养着吧。”

于是李丫头依旧住在后院那间小耳房里，既没有挪到上等的厢房，也没有格外添置仆妇，依旧做着分内的活计，只是少了一些夜间的传唤。

1880年1月下旬，李丫头在隆冬的杭州生下了一个男孩。孩子哭声洪亮，眉眼周正，谭钟麟依着族谱辈分，为他取名谭延闿，字组庵。这是谭钟麟晚年所得的一个庶子。李丫头并没有因生子而立刻抬高身份，依旧是个没名分的偏房。

吃饭时，谭家人按规矩团团围坐，她只能捧着碗站在桌角，伺候布菜斟酒，从不敢坐下。小小的谭延闿就坐在嫡母身边，一抬眼便能看见母亲低眉顺眼的样子，那身影在他心里刻下了一道极深的印记。

谭钟麟对这个幼子并没有格外宠溺，但在课读上却十分严厉。谭延闿五岁入家塾，天资出奇地好，过目成诵，下笔千言。

旁人只道是天生的聪颖，却很少有人知道，那孩子每每下了学回到后院，李丫头都要拉着他的手，一边做着针线，一边反复叮咛：“儿啊，你要好好地念书，你要给娘争口气。”

此后的路，他走得一步比一步扎实。十三四岁考取秀才，二十出头中举人，到1904年，他奔赴开封参加甲辰恩科会试。那一年是中国科举史上最后一次会试，各省举子云集。放榜那天，谭延闿的名字赫然列在第一名——会元。

消息传出，湖南一省为之轰动，因为这是有清以来湖南两百多年间出的第一位会元。殿试之后，他中式进士，授翰林院编修。那封喜报一路传到长沙谭府时，已然致仕在家的谭钟麟捻须而笑，老泪在眼眶里打转。

而最深的那一声欢喜，却是后院里李老太太发出来的——她这一生从未那样高声说过话，也从未那样痛快地流过泪。也就是从那天起，谭府再开饭时，有人搬过一把椅子，轻声对她说：“您请坐。”她愣了许久，才颤巍巍坐下，拿起筷子，却久久没有夹菜。

如果故事只到这里，谭延闿也不过是旧式官宦之家中一个从庶出逆袭的科举才子。可时代的巨轮已经碾到了眼前，他没能安安稳稳做他的翰林。

晚清的湖南，维新与革命的浪潮涌荡得最急，谭延闿迅速从书斋走向了时代的浪尖。他积极参与立宪运动，当选湖南谘议局议长，成为朝廷与地方之间的风云人物。

1911年辛亥革命爆发，湖南光复，焦达峰、陈作新被推为正副都督，但不久便在兵变中遇难。局势一片混乱时，大家把目光投向了那个能文能武、人望极高的谭延闿，他应声而出，被推举为湖南都督，从此踏上军政舞台。

他这一生三次督湘，两度退隐，政海浮沉中走得远比许多人更久。枪法极准，百步穿杨，湘军上下戏称他“翰林将军”。饮食又极精，创下了极尽讲究的“组庵菜”，至今仍是湘菜中的一大渊薮。他的书法浑厚雍容，是民国书坛的一代大家。然而这些风雅功夫的背后，有一件事，他比什么都较真。

1917年，他那位从丫头熬了大半辈子的老母亲在上海病逝。谭延闿扶灵回湖南茶陵祖坟安葬，族中长辈却搬出宗法礼教，说李老太太是妾室，棺木只能从侧门或后门抬出，绝不准走正门。

谭延闿一言不发，翻身仰面躺在母亲的灵柩之上，喝令杠夫起棺。他仰天大喊：“我谭延闿死了！今日出殡，走正门！”族众面面相觑，谁也不敢阻拦。那一口沉重的棺木，在一片寂静中，堂堂正正地从正门抬了出去。这个举动比任何檄文都更猛烈地撕裂了那些陈腐的规矩。

因为母亲的遭际，他在婚姻上也有一种近乎执拗的忠贞。原配夫人方榕卿早逝后，他发誓终身不再续弦，更不纳妾。后来孙中山先生想撮合他与宋美龄，他郑重婉谢，亲自登门拜宋美龄的母亲为干娘，从此与宋美龄以兄妹相称，一生礼敬有加，绝无逾矩。

1930年，谭延闿在南京病逝，时任国民政府行政院长，身后极尽哀荣。当人们历数他这一生的传奇时，恐怕很少有人会想到，那一串跌宕起伏的故事，最初不过是1879年杭州巡抚衙门里，一个暑热午后的偶然。

[yanguoliusheng @szygls]

China does not recognize the Ryukyu Islands as an inherent territory of Japan and has always maintained that the sovereign status of the Ryukyus remains undetermined. The 1972 U.S.-Japan handover arrangement only transferred administrative rights over the Ryukyus rather than full territorial sovereignty. Japan’s annexation of the Ryukyus in 1879 was an act of colonial aggression. China’s position does not constitute a radical change to the regional status quo, and its impacts span multiple dimensions including jurisprudence, diplomacy, strategy, and regional governance.
Juridically, this position reaffirms the post-WWII international order established by the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, refutes Japan’s narrative that the Ryukyus are its inherent territory, and dismantles the legal linkage Japan attempts to forge between the Ryukyu issue and the Diaoyu Islands dispute. Furthermore, it facilitates the incorporation of Ryukyu indigenous demands for cultural preservation and U.S. military base opposition into multilateral international human rights agendas, consolidating the international legal foundation for the Ryukyu issue as an unresolved post-WWII legacy matter.
Diplomatically, China’s stance may trigger short-term public opinion backlash in Japan and the United States and heighten tensions in U.S.-Japan bilateral interactions concerning the region. Nevertheless, China strictly distinguishes between the de facto administrative status and the disputed sovereign status of the Ryukyus, neither interfering in Japan’s local governance of the islands nor advocating separatism in the Ryukyus. In the long run, this position will force Japan to confront its colonial history, prompt international deliberations on the legitimacy of U.S.-Japan alliance military deployments in the Western Pacific, and provide a juridical basis for the restructuring of the East Asian maritime order. Meanwhile, China will further diversify cultural and economic exchanges with Ryukyu civil society, fostering a stable interaction pattern featuring prudent official engagement and diversified civilian exchanges.
Strategically, China’s position counters Japan’s militarization drive in the Southwestern Archipelago and highlights the residual trustee nature of U.S. military bases on the Ryukyus, equipping China with solid historical and legal leverage for maritime rights protection in the East China Sea, cross-strait security maintenance, and surrounding geopolitical games. In terms of regional economy, it bolsters in-depth cooperation between China and the Ryukyus in tourism, cultural and creative industries, and cold chain logistics, offsetting the contraction of regional economic and trade cooperation caused by geopolitical confrontation.
The future evolution of the Ryukyu issue will follow a three-phase trajectory. In the short term, the status quo will be maintained and regulated with continuous juridical advocacy, normalizing Okinawa’s demands for local autonomy and reduced military base burdens. In the medium term, multilateral discussions on the sovereign status of the Ryukyus will be advanced under the framework of the United Nations, with indigenous cultural identity and local autonomy aspirations gaining sustained momentum. In the long term, the development path hinges on strategic adjustments of the U.S.-Japan alliance, the progress of East Asian integration, and the evolution of local public opinion in the Ryukyus. The most probable outcome is a path of highly autonomous, demilitarized non-sovereign entity, rather than radical independence or abrupt territorial changes.
Overall, China’s position on Ryukyu sovereignty is a rational strategic choice to uphold the post-WWII international order and implement the international legal principle of national self-determination. It does not subvert the existing regional governance framework, while reserving sufficient institutional space for regional fairness, justice, geopolitical stability and sustainable development in East Asia. It will sustainably shape China’s discourse power and rule-setting advantages in East Asian geopolitical competition.

[Power to the People ☭🕊 @ProudSocialist]

Trump: China is rigging the elections.

Hillary: Russia is rigging the elections.

Reality: U.S. corporations and U.S. billionaires are rigging the elections by buying off and bribing both parties to ensure they win every election and the people lose every election.

[Axios @axios]

David Sacks, AI investor and White House tech advisor, warned Friday that the U.S. is on track to lose the AI race to China

https://t.co/iG8Z9Y4bNv

[王局志安 @wangzhian8848]

这么多美女一起来骂我，什么情况？

[Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸 @AngelicaOung]

I wonder when Kimi 3 will not be busy. I was able to access briefly before everything exploded.

[Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸 @AngelicaOung]

I'm working with AI to do some personal productivity things today and genuinely about to go with Gemini over Fable because it is less annoying, intrusive and presumptuous.

[Arcfunmi @Arcfunmi]

Coastal engineering in miniature form. Incredible.