Geldwolfs

28th husband of Joe exotic

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.

"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣

"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣

This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣).

The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.

The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.

I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@929304ANL @Scholske_75 @JanJambon @federalepolitie Waarschijnlijk undercover of een goede reden om nl plaat te gebruiken.. Ik snap niet waar dat jij zo een spel van maakt eigenlijk.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@LodeCossaer Ik had hier dus een discussie over laatst. Iemand die me zei je kan Toch niet verwachten dat iemand die job gaat doen als die jaren dit heeft gedaan.. dus omdat die persoon zich te goed voelt, moet ik dat geld Dan maar ophoesten?

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@Devils1robot @WallStreetMav @m Sorry for the tag @m can't delete it

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@Devils1robot @WallStreetMav I am Belgian and th situation is crazy so the greens where in the government last government and they just wanted something to say so they got the closure of the nuclear power plants so they would shut the fuck up. The stupidest decision ever ad we import 83% of energy. @m

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@hippojuicefilm I hate people like this so much. Would love to see him have a grave accident

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

7/
Onze politici weten dit ook. Ze kiezen er alleen voor om het niet te doen. Spreadsheet open. Kolom één. Begin daar. Voor het te laat is. 🇧🇪

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

België is bijna failliet. Als ondernemer die zichzelf meerdere keren radicaal heeft moeten heruitvinden om te overleven, herken ik dit patroon. En het maakt me kwaad.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

6/
Je kan je klanten niet blijven belasten zonder waarde te leveren. Geen enkel bedrijf overleeft dat. Klanten lopen weg. In een land stoppen mensen met presteren — of vertrekken ze gewoon.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@TerryJa89485359 @SpaceNews_Inc Those politicians drag us down every single time, yet you want more of them.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@itz__aria Price range?

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@leomeethewoo Price range? We are https://t.co/decgmxaNp7

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@EricCorijn Holy shit, dit is.. 1 verantwooordelijk daders 2 verantwoordelijkheid ouders. Welke draai je er ook aan wilt geven. Stop nu eens met het goed te praten. Het is door en door slecht wat die “jongeren” doen en er moet hard opgetreden worden. Elke euro schade moet vergoed worden.

[Geldwolfs @geldwolfs]

@BenKhalud 🙏🏻🙏🏻bedankt!