John smith

[John smith @genganzo]

@WingedNetMonkey @BarbaraOneillAU Yes! On the other hand, I adore figs in any form.

[John smith @genganzo]

@thomasdestella 😂😂

[John smith @genganzo]

@bennyjohnson Aided and abetted by the pill and no-fault divorce.

[John smith @genganzo]

@AJamesMcCarthy For detail, okay. But yours is more dramatic.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

[John smith @genganzo]

@NicsJourney Like down here in central Texas….

[John smith @genganzo]

@Nutmegbunny9 Heartbreaking story. I hope things settle down for the boys.

[John smith @genganzo]

@TafPomScotiPole @JakeCan72 War on Beauty

[John smith @genganzo]

@StealthyStoat @JakeCan72 I would agree so much. But then there’s summer in Texas…😳

[John smith @genganzo]

@BigMac61815311 @JakeCan72 You’re turned off. Wonder what women think….

[John smith @genganzo]

@JakeCan72 @elonmusk Beautiful. Also he had never spent a summer in central Texas.

[Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 @Kristof_Poland]

Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.

Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.

1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.

2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.

3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.

4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.

5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.

6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.

7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.

[John smith @genganzo]

@nicksortor Well yeah but she’s not really free. Have you ever been inside a mental hospital?

[John smith @genganzo]

@KerryHolmekb Retire

[John smith @genganzo]

@FAFOFarmsTX Did she have an infection?

[John smith @genganzo]

@FAFOFarmsTX She’s so beautiful.

[Promethean Action @PrometheanActn]

Latest from Promethean Action author Mike Steger. President Trump and Scott Bessent are following the money and moving to dismantle the dark money machine behind American politics.

[John smith @genganzo]

@DuongHuong70229 Ballet de pied 😉

[John smith @genganzo]

@RichOToole 😂😂
And BTW, the chicken fajita tacos at Los Tres Gallos in Lexington (Tx) are Outstanding.

[John smith @genganzo]

@NicsJourney @chefarchiepie The best way to eat corned beef!!