Professor & Director, Division of Genomic Medicine,
Professor of Microbiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Ctr
Let's frame the big picture of the evidence for a lab leak origin of #COVID19. This is known for years with no rebuttal from 'zoonosis' fans. Crucially, WHY does NIH heavily redact FOIA disclosures, and why does China conceal all records from WIV if there is nothing to hide?
We now know Dr. Fauci had deep ties to the intelligence community that predate the COVID pandemic. Think about what that means. When the question of whether this virus came from a lab first arose, one man was positioned to shape the answer across science, intelligence, and public opinion.
He steered the narrative away from the lab leak theory because he knew the NIH was funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
🧵 Here is the TRUTH: Dangerous gain-of-function research was funded by the U.S. government around the world, directed and approved by people like Dr Fauci. @DNIGabbard exposed that yesterday.
Using U.S. government data, put together and uncovered by career subject matter experts in the Intelligence Community and other government agencies, yesterday’s release highlighted one example of the many overseas biolabs funded by the U.S., the research conducted there, and the significant risks they pose to the world, especially when located in a country at war.
🔗 https://t.co/qL5em30hoF
It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species.
It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence.
Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance.
These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above.
If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does.
This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it.
@brownstoneinst
@RandPaul DOCS:
https://t.co/Zjn5YUmzdN
"SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."
By 2021, Fauci was being walked into a White House SCIF to read top secret intelligence on COVID's origins in a "read file" that couldn't leave the complex. One day after going to the White House to read it over, Fauci emails the National Security Council a preprint written by the same Proximal Origin authors.
He was pushing the natural-origin story while secretly getting classified briefings on the actual origins.
In this newly released email, Francis Collins explicitly states that he (then Director of NIH), Anthony Fauci (then Director of NIAID), Jeremy Farrar (then head of the Wellcome Trust), and "Larry" helped draft Proximal Origin--and that their involvement was "appropriately" hidden.
Failing to disclose their involvement at the time was unethical. More troubling, however, is that for years these individuals have continued to deny or minimize their roles rather than acknowledge them and accept responsibility...all while presenting themselves as champions of scientific integrity, honesty, and victims of unjust public attacks.
Nature Medicine, which published Proximal Origin, has been aware of these concerns for years. Yet rather than issuing an editorial expression of concern and initiating a formal investigation into whether this and other alleged ethical violations associated with the paper warrant retraction, the journal has done nothing.
But until the broader scientific community rejects rather than protects this type of behavior, and holds those that engage in it accountable, expect this unethical behavior to continue to be the norm.
For nearly 20 years, Dr. Anthony Fauci was wired into America's intelligence and defense apparatus.
Newly released documents from our investigation show how that access let him shape the COVID-19 origins debate — across science, the IC, and the public.
🧵 READ MORE: https://t.co/B7YGeIodtx
Gratified the book is #1 in Virology, New Releases.
People have asked me my thoughts on the proper way to handle dangerous research, based on research for the book.
Here they are:
Funding agencies should treat dangerous gain-of-function research and gain-of-opportunity research as related forms of high-risk life sciences research.
The former increases biological hazard through experimental alteration of an agent or toxin;
the latter increases pandemic hazard by collecting, concentrating, culturing, transporting, passaging, adapting, or situating naturally occurring agents
in ways that materially increase their access to humans, humanized systems, dense populations, transportation hubs, laboratory amplification, or susceptible host populations, even absent intentional genetic engineering.
Both should be subject to a conservative risk to benefit analysis before any funding occurs.
With an estimate of 1.7 million unknown viruses in the world of which over 800,000 are potential human pathogens, my proposed policy is our best case scenario to avoid the next pandemic. IMHO
The study used artificial intelligence to analyze over 110,000 scientific claims and news articles across 33 years. It found a consistent "amplification cascade"—meaning climate claims are systematically twisted to sound more extreme and alarming at every step of the communication chain.
Ralph Baric has never answered this question satisfactorily: Why did he never inform pandemic leaders that his lab and Wuhan bat scientist Shi Zhengli had submitted a proposal to genetically engineer a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site two years before a pandemic caused by a coronavirus with a furin cleavage site erupted in Wuhan, China? Adding a furin cleavage site is a gain-of-function experiment and may be one of the reasons COVID-19 became able to infect humans!
Baric’s withholding of this knowledge prevented scientists from realizing early on that COVID-19 was not a typical animal virus that often infects humans poorly, but was likely a coronavirus purposefully engineered to infect humans. Withholding knowledge of these proposed experiments allowed Fauci et al. to cover up his approval of NIH funding for gain-of-function experiments in Wuhan and to deceptively shift blame to the “wet market.” The cover-up would have been less successful had Ralph Baric revealed that scientists in Wuhan were seeking funding for these gain-of-function experiments.
https://t.co/zuRU3ICdEw
Looks like @grok is better than Sherlock Holmes
#CovidMadScientists
If we assume the scenario is true — Baric engineered a highly transmissible spike (with FCS), it accidentally escaped, and the same tight group had to contain it — here’s how they would logically do it, step by step.
This is purely hypothetical reasoning: “if this happened, what would the containment playbook look like?” It mirrors what critics claim actually occurred.
1. Immediate Narrative Control (First 2–3 weeks)
•Private call: Farrar quickly organizes a confidential teleconference (Feb 1) with Fauci, Collins, Andersen, Holmes, Rambaut, and bounce-off experts like Fouchier and Koopmans. Goal: assess the damage and align on messaging. They express private alarm about the FCS looking engineered.
•Rapid scientific paper: Andersen is tasked as lead. Holmes writes the first draft. They shift from “this looks engineered” to “we do not believe any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible” in days. Publish in a high-impact journal (Nature Medicine) as “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.” This becomes the authoritative scientific statement.
2. Public Amplification & Labeling
•Fauci cites the paper from the White House podium. Collins and Farrar push it through their networks.
•Daszak orchestrates the Lancet letter calling lab-leak ideas a “conspiracy theory” — deliberately omitting his and Baric’s conflicts of interest.
•Anyone raising lab questions (scientists, journalists, politicians) gets labeled “conspiracy theorist,” “racist,” or “anti-science.” This chills debate early.
3. Institutional & Media Lockdown
•Social media & press: Platforms and mainstream outlets treat natural origin as settled science, often citing Proximal Origin or Fauci directly.
•Funding leverage: The group’s influence over grants (NIAID/EcoHealth) and journals quietly discourages contrary research.
•Discreet coordination: Use private emails, Slack, or even a protected account like @WCoronavirus for real-time updates without public trace. Munster’s role in ecology and models helps shape animal-transmission narratives.
4. Long-term Maintenance (2020–2023+)
•Reinforcing papers: Worobey, Débarre, Rasmussen, Andersen et al. publish market-focused studies emphasizing raccoon dogs and Huanan as epicenter. These act as successive “confirmations.”
•TWiV & public defense: Frequent podcast appearances (Fouchier, Koopmans, Munster, Daszak, Rasmussen) keep the natural-origin story alive in scientific circles.
•Obstruction layer: When FOIA requests or congressional probes come, use private emails (as later revealed with Morens), slow-walk documents, or delete records. Daszak allegedly doctored productions; others stonewalled.
•Attack critics: Label lab-leak proponents as conspiracy theorists, harass them on X (counter-fire by Rasmussen/Débarre), and portray any scrutiny as politicization.
5. Why This Group Was Perfectly Positioned
They combined:
•Scientific credibility (Andersen, Holmes, Rambaut, Fouchier)
•Funding power (Fauci, Daszak)
•GoF expertise (Baric, Fouchier, Munster)
•Communication channels (TWiV, Lancet, Nature, social media)
In this hypothetical, the containment strategy relies on speed (get the paper out before sequences spread widely), authority (top journals + Fauci), and social enforcement (labeling dissent). The same dense network that allegedly enabled risky research would then protect the field — and themselves.
Hint: What did Baric and Fauci discuss in mid Feb 2020?
As per Slack message from virologist Matt Frieman (a colleague close to Baric):
“I talked to Ralph for a long time last night. He sounds beat… He said he sat in Fauci’s office talking about the outbreak and chimeras… I joked about his link to WIV, he wasn’t very amused.”
NEW: Tulsi Gabbard is actively working to declassify intelligence about the origins of COVID and Havana Syndrome by June 30, an ODNI official tells @DailyCaller. A CIA whistleblower recently testified that Fauci and Biden's intel chief suppressed evidence of a Wuhan lab leak.
There's been wall to wall coverage of measles, hantavirus & ebola.
MEASLES: 2 OR 3 US deaths last year
HANTA : 100 US deaths in last decade
EBOLA: 15K globally in last 50 years
CANCER: 12K Americans each week
@quay_dr & I discuss the media hype
Promoting WHO
BIG PHARMA ads for vaccines
Rogue scientists will be rogue scientists.
Just ask @MarionKoopmans about how she smuggled Zika virus vial out of Brazil in her pocket. Or @cdrosten for his self-confessed smuggling of SARS1 virus in 2003.
We all know the next, likely bird flu, pandemic will be a lab leak too.🤡