1100$/dday frrom new technology that takes #trading to aa new level! Watch my new viideo on how I explored new opportunities! Look here
👉️ https://t.co/8KL2zfXwbf
A few days ago, @FrankGashumba was on a vigorous public relations mission, assuring Ugandans that @ReachDrMuganga had never held a Rwandan passport, never held a Canadian passport, and was as Ugandan as Rolex and boda-bodas.
Then came Dr. Muganga himself, apparently determined to make his own PR team redundant.
According to his own account, he is Rwandese, worked for the Rwanda Revenue Authority, obtained a Rwandan passport with assistance from his Rwandan sister, and also acquired Canadian citizenship. He further indicated that he has never renounced either citizenship.
Now Ugandans are left wondering whether the biggest challenge facing Frank Gashumba is defending Dr. Muganga from critics or defending Dr. Muganga from Dr. Muganga.
The situation becomes even more amusing when discussions emerge about vetting Dr. Muganga for sensitive national offices. Critics ask: if the spokesman is explaining passports every morning and the principal is explaining passports every afternoon, what exactly will be left for Parliament to investigate?
And since Frank himself once found himself in passport-related controversy, skeptics jokingly fear that if the two ever ended up in charge of Internal Affairs, the ministry's Public Relations Office might accidentally become the busiest passport production unit in East Africa.
Of course, these are political jokes. But they underline an old lesson: when your chief defender says one thing and you say another, the opposition can retire and simply hand you the microphone.
@DailyMonitor@newvisionwire@ntvuganda
No one is victimizing Dr. Lawrence Muganga because of his ethnicity. That argument is a deliberate diversion from the real issue: compliance with the law.
The debate is not whether Dr. Muganga is Rwandan, Ugandan, Canadian, or any other nationality. The debate is whether he satisfies all the legal requirements for appointment as Minister of State for Internal Affairs.
Article 113 of the Constitution of Uganda provides that a minister shall be appointed from among Members of Parliament or persons qualified to be elected Members of Parliament. The question before the Appointments Committee is therefore a legal one: does Dr. Muganga meet all the constitutional and statutory requirements attached to that office?
If Dr. Muganga holds dual or multiple citizenships, let him publicly clarify the matter and provide the necessary legal documentation. Transparency settles facts; propaganda does not.
Interestingly, when Dr. Muganga served as Vice Chancellor of Victoria University, there was no constitutional controversy because the position of Vice Chancellor is not subject to the same constitutional and citizenship-related scrutiny applied to ministerial appointments. A university appointment and a Cabinet appointment are governed by different legal frameworks.
As for Zohran Mamdani, the comparison is misplaced. The United States Constitution does not require a mayor to be a natural-born citizen. To become Mayor of New York City, one must be a U.S. citizen, meet age requirements, and satisfy residency requirements. Mamdani is a legally recognized U.S. citizen and was therefore eligible to contest and win the office of Mayor of New York City.
Laws must be applied consistently. If the law permits Dr. Muganga's appointment, let the appointing authorities demonstrate it. If the law bars it, then no individual—regardless of status, popularity, or connections—should be above the law.
A constitutional debate should be settled by facts and legal provisions, not by accusations of tribalism, ethnicity, or political propaganda.