@IshmiesterIV@Dexerto If the movie had bombed he would have lost nothing and been paid, as he sold the rights. The production company would have wrote the losses off to lower the taxable income on other movies.
@hockeynhl27@armaan_sohi@SteveMcLean888 Also Quebec was forced to trade for and then trade to Sags becauae they didnt have the compensation to finish a trsde from years ago
@SkylerWillden@Wade87847973 That pushed the puck in. You cannot jab under the goalie to push the puck in.
Youd need definitive proof that the play on the loose puck put the puck in, not the play under Andersen, as the goal was called no goal on the ice.
@SkylerWillden@Wade87847973 It would matter. You can make plays on the puck but you can't push the goalies equipment into the puck to force it in.
The distinction here is that when the puck is smothered, was there continous motion due to the Vegas player hitting it prior, or was the jabs under andersen
@MarcelAndRogie Its not a loose puck though. The puck was smothered by Andersen and the refs intention was to blow the whistle.
You need conclusive evidence that this puck never stopped moving under Andersen, which cant happen. If Vegas player pushed this puck while under Andersen, its GI.
@PMike96608721@JFreshHockey Larkin will just be telling GMs not to negotiate NMC if he forces Detroit to trade him where he wants to go for pennies. Youre just telling GMs "we dont honor our contracts"
@sabretts81@FakeGuentzel59 Sure, if you hit the puck before making contact with the goalie. Can't block the goalie from being able to make a play on the puck in the crease.
@SamBrowniepts@McCartyDangles Larkin has no leverage. Hes signed for 5 more years. Detroit isnt going to trade Larkin for a buncha mid assets like Vancouver.
@celistormd@JMaine518@ArmyofRay1@MaidenlessSage I mean you don't have to play it. Speak with your wallet.
It takes place in the God of War universe using an established god of war franchise character. That is why there is a subname.