@F1Gaslight@diamante_io "that moment" is always clearer in hindsight.
The ones building through it rarely get credit until the next cycle confirms they were right ๐
@JacobKnowsWeb3@diamante_io Hopium over preparation is the default setting for most of the industry until the correction hits and then everyone acts surprised ๐ฌ
@AnshulSachan007@diamante_io And the ones that set the next standard never announced it, they just built correctly while everyone else was focused on speed... the correction confirmed it later ๐
@diamante_io Watched the internet go through this, watched cloud go through this, every time ppl said the fix could wait... every time the ones who didn't wait ended up defining what came next ๐
BREAKING: ๐บ๐ธ WHITE HOUSE JUST ANNOUNCED THAT THE CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE BILL WILL PASS TODAY
TRILLIONS ARE WAITING TO FLOW IN ONCE IT PASSES
THIS IS ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE ๐
๐จ IT'S OFFICIAL: Chinese President Xi Jinping has COMMITTED to order 200 large Boeing jets, after President Trump's closed door meeting
"Boeing only wanted 150 โ he got 200!" ๐ฅ
"That's a big thing...that's a LOT OF JOBS. A LOT." ๐บ๐ธ๐จ๐ณ
More wins!
BREAKING: America and China BOTH AGREE that Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon according to White House officials
I am in complete and total shock
Trump did the impossible
@diamante_io Never really thought about the difference between secure and durable before but it's actually huge, one is a snapshot, the other survives the shifts you didn't plan for ๐
@diamante_io From what I can tell the most expensive upgrades in any system are always the ones that happen after the breaking point not before it ๐
@diamante_io Never thought about security as something that could just fade rather than break, but that's actually exactly what happens when the assumptions underneath it stop being valid!
No warning, no moment to react ๐
@diamante_io From what I can tell the difference between a breaking point being theoretical and being real is just time and hardware.
Both of those are moving in the wrong direction right now ๐
@diamante_io "adapting to it vs built for it" is the whole story.
Adapting means you're always one step behind a threat that doesn't slow down for your roadmap ๐
@florne21@diamante_io Every wallet you ever used, every signature, still sitting there. The only thing that changed is how close we are to someone being able to read them all ๐
@FullCoreVic@diamante_io Better memory and zero option to delete.
Every transaction, every signature, sitting there permanently until someone with the right hardware decides to open it ๐
@diamante_io From what I can tell most people using crypto have no idea their on-chain history is being stored by actors waiting for better tools to read it.
That's not a future problem that's already done ๐
@diamante_io Never thought about security in terms of cost before but that's actually exactly what it is, the moment breaking it becomes cheap enough everything built on that assumption is exposed ๐
@bserial42 @diamante_io 10 years out thinking vs this quarter hype is exactly the difference between infrastructure and narrative, one of them holds when things get serious ๐ค
@trichydhanabal2@diamante_io Adapting is the right word but the timeline matters, some of these changes need years of consensus to implement.
Quantum doesn't wait for roadmaps ๐
@Alfredoasuaje@diamante_io "find out the hard way" with no patch available is a very different situation from a regular bug fix... you can't hotfix a cryptographic assumption ๐
@flame_dyor@diamante_io Building for current conditions works until the conditions change faster than you can adapt.
That's not a trading problem that's a foundation problem.