@Safaricom_Care I sent money to the wrong till
UGAMPB2VLV Confirmed. Ksh660.00 sent to BEN KIPKOGEI CHEMWENO 0712814917 on 10/7/26 at 1:47 PM. . New Merchant Account Balance is Ksh0.00. Transaction cost, Ksh13.00. Track your sales on M-PESA business App. Download https://t.co/5tb0NtzCm4
Rigathi Gachagua has made a statement that is reportedly causing anxiety in State House.
He has said that in a United Alternative Government, leaders such as Martha Karua, Edwin Sifuna, Fred Matiang'i, David Maraga, or Okiya Omtatah could all become the presidential candidate.
That message appears to have unsettled those whose political strategy has been to portray Gachagua as a tribal leader. For them, the narrative has always been simple: "Rigathi Gachagua is the problem."
Now they are faced with a different reality. If a coalition can comfortably rally behind leaders from different regions and backgrounds, then the accusation of tribalism becomes harder to sustain.
Kenyans know that tribal politics has been used as a distraction while corruption, waste, and economic hardship continue unchecked. That is why the emerging "Wantam" movement resonates with many people.
Kenyans present it not as a tribal project, but as a rallying call against what we view as poor governance, corruption, tribalism and mismanagement.
Whether one agrees with Gachagua or not, the political significance of his statement is clear: he is signaling that the opposition should be bigger than any one individual, and that the presidential flag bearer can come from any region if that is what it takes to remove the termites from statehouse.
For those who expected him to insist on being the sole candidate, that message changes the conversation entirely.