Elevating your jiu-jitsu and fitness | Decades of combined experience | The face of "jiu-jitsu" GIFs 🥋 | I got your 🔙 @alwaysthegoal | Enjoy it while you can
Run the audit. Take it seriously. Then size the fix to the operation you actually have — not the one a model imagines for you.
Audits find problems. Judgment sizes solutions.
Full write-up:
https://t.co/43HywTg5SS
#AIagents#LLM#BuildInPublic
You cannot be your own training partner.
I built an AI operating system on Claude — 1,500+ sessions, one person at the controls. I packaged 55 files of it and had a competing model audit it cold.
Its verdict: I wasn't safe.
You think the audit gives you the answer. It doesn't.
The audit gives you the question. A list of problems is not a list of fixes.
That gap is where your judgment lives — or doesn't.
Piece 6 of 6 of my current Opus 4.7 series — just published:
https://t.co/25AwvFy8v8
If you don't have the time, just open the thread — I'll get to the point…
I audited four AI governance files I maintain to see what was influencing drift.
The audit found the drift stacked to one file.
It was the one I maintained most carefully. #Claude
The mat version:
A student drills their A-game ten thousand times. The one they stopped having me check the day they got comfortable.
Every rep is a small unsupervised amendment. The deviations compound. The technique they trust most develops the worst structural flaw.
Zero-overlap is the default. Overlap is the diagnostic.
Piece 4 of 6 — just published:
https://t.co/X9wHRBUdwQ
If you don't have the time, just open the thread — I'll get to the point…
Six runs, six different work types. Zero overlap five times, one overlap once.
Two AI reviewers on the same artifact. Dispatched together, run independently. Five of six rounds, the findings sets didn't intersect at all.
That isn't redundancy. That's the methodology. #Claude
Triage is the discipline.
Irreversible actions, governance edits, production deploys — run both reviewers. Two-times cost for two-times defect-class coverage.
Everything below that line, one reviewer is enough. The cost only earns its keep where the failure mode is permanent.