Streaming schedule
Mon: 11am - 2pm EST
Tues: Off
Wed: 11am - 2pm EST
Thur: Off
Fri: 2pm - 12pm EST (dinner break somewhere in between there)
Sat:Off
Sun:Off
https://t.co/py2nabD0C2
@DDarnae@MeganFoxWriter@YouTube LOL he blacked out identifying info ALSO bar ethics complaints are PUBLIC INFO it is not doxxing if its publicly available
@mrmattcousins @SimonTemplar741 @b_vplants@MediaRival @RainedOutRant @barnes_law See normally thats the glorious thing about the US legal system when its actually working properly. You don't have to prove you don't have it, the plantiffs have to show evidence that he did have it. Which they never did.
@Ticcer@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law Not wrong there, but I'll atleast put it out there in hopes that it enlightens atleast one person. Barnes by far has some of the biggest balls in the industry lmao
@jacobkillian@PacelliTroy@NoVoiceTweets@MediaRival@barnes_law It's literally a chicken or egg argument about whether he complied with discovery. He cannot turnover that which doesn't exist. Court says he has it. He says it doesn't exist b/c they don't generate that kind of record. Court makes him generate it. Court still finds him faulty.
@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law (2/2) well there's 265 business days in a year for Jones and over 795 days he has segments of his show maybe 5 times and mentions something about it off hand maybe 10 times on top of that? Doesn't sound like a ton of growth to me
Judge in #AlexJones trial made it clear she could jail #AlexJones if he testifies honestly on his own behalf in his own defense. That's how nuts that case has become.
@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law (2/2) the lack of school safety via locks on the doors and a couple conspiracies revolving around why the school was torn down almost immediately after the shooting.
@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law (1/2)Lol the graphs in court have only been shown over yearly basis. With large jumps in 2016-2018. Tons of other events that happened in those years like an election. His actual videos or mentions of SH in those years were only a handful of times mostly pointing out
@SimonTemplar741 @b_vplants@MediaRival @RainedOutRant @barnes_law (2/2) because of the fact that he has posted retractions both on and off the air to those statements. Which BTW he isn't allowed to show evidence to in this trial at all.
@SimonTemplar741 @b_vplants@MediaRival @RainedOutRant @barnes_law (1/2)All the time? No the are not but the point is that if they do with the same level of evidence, then they would have been dismissed. A case like this against a media company, has to prove "actual malice" to move forward in a case which by definition in any other case couldn't
@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law Lots of other events happened over the years that were the real drivers of his revenue growth. As for Barnes, by the Jones precedent being set right now, your own words would land you in court for the same reason. Barnes is by far one of the most respectable lawyers out there
@Karlarei2003@MediaRival@barnes_law Lol if all you have been doing is watching the trial then you have only 30% of the facts. Jones has retracted and apologized repeatedly over the years for statements he made about Sandy Hook. The financials shown in the trial literally show miniscule amounts of money made via SA
@SimonTemplar741 @b_vplants@MediaRival @RainedOutRant @barnes_law Also if you applied the same level of tort claim against any other media organization this whole trial wouldn't have happened. It would have been dismissed due to anti-slapp. But Jones is "not media" according to these judges
@mlwbubba8@MediaRival@barnes_law Lmao, you cant charge either of them with jury tampering when the jury isn't supposed to be looking at media pertaining to Jones at all
@PhineasQDotcom @ChrisGo68942833 @barnes_law@Cernovich Theres a stark difference between "refusing to" and "not being allowed to"
Jones wasn't allowed to show things, the judge even handed him a court order saying as much. I dont call that refusing to do anything