Hey all🚀
Looking to connect with people building in:
🛠️ SaaS
💻 Tech
⚙️ Automation
🤖 AI Tools
📦 Product Development
🌐 Web Apps
👨💻 Devs
Drop what you're working on 👇
Everyone's designing agent loops right now. The thing that decides if a loop is safe is its stop condition.
If an AI checks the AI, that's just one more loop to trust. The one check with no model in it: a regression suite.
This is the Hover loop 👇 https://t.co/uOIgDpWZd2
🚀Shipped: hover-dev 0.37 · @hover-dev/mcp 0.36 · Cloud
✨ VS Code: sign-in is optional again; connect the current repo to Cloud right from the panel, or create the project one click away.
✨ MCP: guard-first loop (declare behavior → build to green), Claude Code hooks via `hover-hook install`, and large apps map in parallel.
✨ Cloud: org-owned repos show in the project picker, team invites are link-only.
Full notes: https://t.co/H18QhfoAje
This is the whole reason Hover exists.
An agent loop is only as trustworthy as its stop condition. We make that condition a regression suite you own, with zero AI in it.
Define the behavior once. Every loop has to pass it. 🌲 https://t.co/uOIgDpWZd2
100% this. Every agent loop needs a way to verify its own work.
The piece I'd add: if the AI verifies the AI, who verifies that?
The one check with no model in it is a regression suite. Define the behavior once, and every loop has to pass it.
That's what I'm building 👉 https://t.co/sLpQBQf95I
Great framing. The part I'd underline: a loop is only as good as its stop condition. Turn-based and goal-based both live or die on whether the agent can actually verify "done."The subtle trap is verifying with more AI — a second agent, a model score. The exit criteria I trust most are the deterministic ones: a test suite, a type check, a lint gate. Cheap to run every turn, and there's no model to second-guess.
Hey 👋 building @gethover_dev and want to meet more people who ship with AI
🚀 Vibe coders
🧪 Devs who (try to) test
⚙️ SaaS builders
🤖 AI tool makers
What are you building — and what keeps breaking? 👇