GetPOD UK

Proud British firm | RESTORE BRITAIN | Premium sustainable container homes directly funding pods/skills for homeless veterans.

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

Please read our business prospectus. We don't just build homes for customers, we build hope too.

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

Thanks @StrategicHSR for engaging with our prospectus and the kind words.

Our model is built exactly for this; premium sustainable homes that also deliver real skills, purpose and housing outcomes for homeless UK veterans. We’re all about tangible results over bureaucracy.

Genuinely interested in the HSR Act framework and how it envisions shifting providers like us toward direct procurement contracts. Would love to hear more about the details and any practical next steps.

Fully aligned with the #RestoreBritain mission of actually delivering for those who served. 🇬🇧

Happy to jump on a quick call or DM if helpful.

[StrategicHSR @StrategicHSR]

Under the HSR Act framework, enterprises like @getpoduk that deliver tangible infrastructure for veteran welfare shift from grant-seeking to receiving direct government procurement contracts. Your model provides the exact physical security and domestic results our procurement strategy would mandate.

[Peter Bleksley @PeterBleksley]

It will be a very long time before you read anything more important than this from @JChimirie66677…

[Emily Wilding Davison🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Wommando]

⚠️Bulgarian Man Guilty Of Assaulting 12YO Girl In Dundee

Ilia Belov, 22, has been found guilty of assaulting a 12YO girl and acting in a threatening or abusive manner towards four girls aged 12-14.

The court heard Belov made sexual remarks to the girl and pushed the 12YO, causing her to fall and hit her head.

Belov claimed he was acting in self defence after seeing a knife, and denied making sexual comments.

Sheriff Timothy Niven-Smith rejected his evidence as "wholly unconvincing and self-serving," calling it a "revisionist" excuse.

The sheriff accepted the girls’ accounts, supported by CCTV and other witnesses, and said Belov’s remarks triggered the confrontation.

Bulova's sister, Nadjedzha Belova, had already pleaded guilty to the assault on the 13YO girl.

⚖️Sentencing for both is set for 5th August.

🌍The case went viral last year after footage of the girl holding a knife and axe circulated widely.

Several high-profile commentators claimed the girls were lying and were the aggressors, some called it racist far-right propaganda.

➡️Shame on them.

[John Scott-Railton @jsrailton]

Every parent wants to keep their kids safe.

But doesn't want to hand over their photos to the nanny state.

And no adult should have to scan their face just to talk to a friend.

Enormous own goal for the UK

Sure to make UK tech untouchable to the rest of the world. (Except, perhaps, to dictatorships.)

And would slosh massive power to big tech companies.

Finally, it wouldn't take much for the nudity filter to turn into a dissent filter.

Well put by @signalapp

[Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧 @_HenryBolton]

The Prime Minister is unwilling to put the “damn well must do right now” list before his “ideological nice to do bucket list”.

Not for the first time, the Prime Minister is compromising our national security.

The Prime Minister must resign.

[David Betz @DavidBe31099196]

I don’t think that academics should do ‘hot takes’ on matters of the day. Their opinions are rarely better informed than anyone else’s and cloaking them in scholarly garb cheapens the principle of objectivity. With respect to what is occurring in Britain today, in my opinion a fundamental error right now is to let the churn of the daily ‘news’ cycle drive your analysis.

The legacy media, the government, and the police have all forfeited any claim to credibility; they lie routinely, by omission and commission, and they are actively shaping the narrative to protect a failing political order. Strong-arming victims’ families, suppressing footage, and spinning every incident as isolated ‘far-right thuggery’ or random criminality is not journalism or policing, let alone governing—it is damage limitation for a system that has lost control of the streets and the story.

Instead, fix your gaze on the structural factors. Demography, geography, economics, and the hollowing-out of institutional legitimacy matter far more than whatever grainy mobile-phone clip is being waved at us this week.

Britain has imported, at scale and with minimal integration, populations whose cultural distance from the native majority is large and, in important respects, growing rather than shrinking. Parallel societies, concentrated in particular towns and cities, now possess the critical mass to sustain sustained low-level conflict and, when conditions align, more organised violence.

The state’s monopoly on force is visibly fraying; its willingness to use what remains of that monopoly is selective and therefore delegitimising. Trust in the police, courts, and political class is in the basement and still falling. Economic stagnation and housing pressure sharpen every grievance. These are not transient conditions; they are the terrain on which coming events will play out.

On the Belfast attacks specifically: the operators are clearly more security-conscious than has been the case with the migrant hotel and other protests over the last couple of years—masked, disciplined about visuals, limiting the evidential trail. Some attribute this to institutional memory of the Troubles. That may be part of it.

But I suspect the more immediate and probable vector is simple tactical diffusion from the modern Left and anarchist playbook. Black Bloc methods, the utility of anonymity, the selective application of violence, the media choreography—these have been field-tested and refined for years in Europe and North America.

The manuals are not secret and the examples are legion: Marighella’s Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla, the writings of the Red Army Faction, Alinsky’s organising principles stripped of the moralising, the operational literature of the Global Justice movement and Antifa networks.

Remove the Marxist dialectical claptrap and you are left with cold, competent observations about how small, determined groups can punch above their weight against a larger but slower and more constrained opponent. Diffusion of those techniques was inevitable once the incentives aligned.

You don't need an aged ex-IRA uncle to tell you how to do these things. The internet and a library card will do it.

I am wary of firm day-to-day pronouncements precisely because reliable, on-the-ground reporting is so thin. I am not in Belfast, the journalistic desert in this country is real, nearly every dead-tree media and teevee pundit is a literal know nothing.

What I will say with higher confidence on account of my reading of such conflicts elsewhere in the world is that certain escalatory dynamics are now highly probable:

Police over-reaction that produces a martyr or martyrs, further radicalising elements on all sides.

Targeted assassination of a judge, prominent politician, or influential voice.

A spectacular, Christchurch-style mass killing when some individual or cell concludes that only dramatic, indiscriminate violence will break the equilibrium.

Stabbings and gang rapes will continue at their grim baseline; they are already normalised enough that they barely shift the political dial. The deeper pattern is polarisation, erosion of restraint, and the slow emergence of organised ethnic and ideological blocs willing to use force to defend or advance their interests.

All of that is in accordance with the rules of the game of identity politics, which were created by the *very same* people now most frantic about the perilous consequences of their own ideology.

The centre is not holding because it has spent years delegitimising itself and disarming its natural supporters.

Watch the structural trends—demographic momentum, institutional decay, the diffusion of effective small-group tactics, the collapse of shared reality—more than the latest headline. The news will keep lying. The underlying physics of the situation will not.

[Jac o' the North 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 @JacotheNorth]

Anybody recognise him?

[Dr Philip Kiszely @KiszelyPhilip]

We’re at the stage now where beheadings are regrettable, but tweets are unforgivable.

[Frank Stephens @justrightFrank]

An illegal immigrant who arrives by dinghy admits that he's been working for the Taliban since he was 10.
He is put in to a hotel where he kidnaps and sexually assaults a 7 year old child.
British Justice gives him 2.5 years, he will serve about 18 months.
https://t.co/XbgkxsezHg

[Chris Parry @DrChrisParry]

Crikey -

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

Prediction: @Nigel_Farage could well stand down as Reform leader before the end of this year if A) Reform fail to win Makerfield, and B) if @RestoreBritain continue to take high ranking personnel / rank and file away from Reform. Ousting @RupertLowe10 was Farage's greatest error.

[Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪 @PeterMcCormack]

Forced to accept things you didn't vote for.
Called a racist for disagreeing with anything.
The government is stealing all your money.
Shamed for not being happy about it.

The state of 2026.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of 'Crisis' a bit more

So... an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.

The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough)

But then it has added ... “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”... INTERCHANGEABLY?

It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define 'harmful' This guidance has not been voted for or debated

So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a 'crisis'. And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.

Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works.... hoping you won't even notice.

[Patriotic 🇬🇧 Nation @HoodedClaw1974]

Far right or just right?

This well spoken local from Belfast is asked who is to blame for last nights unrest.

Are you listening @Keir_Starmer ? This is how any sane minded person in Britain feels. 💯

Credit @europa

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

Iain Dale left stunned by calm caller on LBC

A composed caller named Mike told Iain Dale on LBC that Britain “will remain almost ungovernable until we have mass deportations”.

The exchange was striking because the caller spoke in measured tones, clearly articulating a view held by millions of people across the country. Yet Iain struggled to process it, repeatedly falling back on “you can’t do that”.

Mike highlighted the obvious disconnect: the British public have consistently voted for lower immigration, only for politicians to deliver record levels instead.

“There’s a massive disconnect between the political class and the people of this country,” he said. “We never gave any consent to this and there’s certainly no mandate for the scale of immigration we’ve seen.”

When Iain pushed back, saying you can’t deport people here perfectly legally, the caller was unflinching:

Caller: “You mean end indefinite leave to remain?”

Iain: “You can do that for future people but you can’t do that for people who have already got it. That would be outrageous.”

Caller: “Yeah you can. Of course you can.”

Iain: “From a fairness point of view, you can’t suddenly tell people who’ve got a perfect legal right to be here that we’re changing the rules now…”

Caller: “You can, Iain.”

Iain: “Well you can do that but is that really the kind of country you want to live in?”

Caller: “Yes!”

Iain continued to argue that you can’t “take it out on perfectly legal, law-abiding people”, clearly unable to grasp how widespread this frustration has become.

The public didn’t always feel this way. Years of politicians ignoring the public on immigration have shifted attitudes dramatically. As the caller made clear, people never voted for this transformation and the consequences of fixing it now rest with those who created the problem.

Well worth a listen. The gap between Westminster and the rest of the country has rarely been clearer.

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

Thanks to all the follows.

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

@ThrEnglushGent @GreenP0wer @rita65453 Boom!

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

@ThrEnglushGent @GreenP0wer @rita65453 When you stop trying, it will happen. PS, I like being ahead of the pack.

[GetPOD UK @getpoduk]

#Makerfield or die!

[Severus @SeverusChud]

A indian on TikTok saw my British Empire edits, and thought I should be ashamed of my history.

So I turned him into my most patriotic Restore Britain edit yet.

[Alexandra @Alexandr4Denman]

We are the United Kingdom! Restore Britain 🇬🇧 is keeping our history our culture our ancestors memories our Christian culture as priority! Join Restore Britain today!!

[🇬🇧💥𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝕱𝖔𝖗 𝕭𝖗𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖎𝖓💥🇦🇺 @Maxwellpainn]

Make it England.

Restore Britain 🇬🇧