Ever will I be least amongst those named talmidei chachamim.
¶
Hvat skal mær bumban undir míni hond
Vil ikki frægur fylgja mær á onnur lond?
¶
Memento mori
Pirkei Avot, 'All love that depends on a something, [when the] thing ceases, [the] love ceases; and [all love] that does not depend on anything, will never cease.'
@zakialucky11 Wurmbrand, "A man believes not what he recites in his creed; but only the things he is willing to die for."
Rise and rise again until lambs become lions.
Conscience and reason are what balance the scales of logic.
Behold the hippodrome. How can one laude a celebrity for an award when their testimony is questionable?
Nay, we ought reserve changing the world for when ego be conquered.
Whence cometh change if ego reigns?
Burden of proof must be met. Ergo herein is the stereotypes one could argue.
What we behold is the Bailey sisters model certain behaviours fueling their detractors.
Granted we ought not cast stones of condemnation. Equally we ought weigh the values daughters learn to emulate.
When you pathologize men repeatedly and endlessly, turning everything from the way they sit into a form of aggression they need to be ashamed of and unlearn, you don't get to blame "patriarchy" for the resulting reclusive behavior.
Feminism taught men everything they do is evil.
One could argue The Bible Collection: Saint Paul (2000) is well founded. However, the problem is with historicity versus canonicity.
Following the path of other such productions we see creators gave tradition greater weight.
What gain be in exaltation of fossilised customs?
Ergo when examining the NT we ought not be passive consumers.
Christianity proclaims IESVS is a Second Temple rav. However, the NT textual claim does not concur with the practise.
Ought blame be upon those shepherds who feed on the fat of the flock?
Admittedly the programme is relatively decent. Granted certain concessions must be made regarding materials.
However, it is equally important to remember certain decisions made were matters of appeasement.
Consider there are moments when one must honour the original design.
Problem is not with beauty. For beauty is never consigned unto the carnate.
Pray do consider the feminal form can be quite pleasing to behold.
However, discarnate feminal pulchritude of fēmina has moved philosophy and art alike.
Perchance we ought sit at the feet of Saraswati.
What gain have we when appointing haniokhos to dictate the measure of value?
Ought we hail the miliarii who told the choros to be silent? However, we instead choose to continue fund the hippodrome.
How have we prospered since outsourcing our morality and ethics?
Furthermore we ought not relegate the plausible possibility Moshe learned his heritage via Midian.
Sufficient arguments exist against the lineage of Moshe. Who says יהוה could not have Midian ben Abraham to prepare Moshe ben Yisrael?
Mayhaps we ought justly weigh all evidence.
Think it not strange Tôrâ is fragmented.
Consider we know Christian canon was formed via competition of divergent theologies. How much more Tôrâ?
Could Moshe have compiled an original ha-sefer Tôrâ? Such is not beyond probability.
Hence the necessity of epistemic agnosticism.
We must separate belief from epistemic akrasia. Oft we count NT as authoritative.
However, one ought enquire whether such authority is from epistēmē. What value is a belief if not examined?
Be not deceived. Doxa is akin to iron pyrite whereas epistēmē is akin to a geode.
@Hellenistic16 Shabbat shalom,
How can one accurately address your enquiry without first acknowledging the textual record?
Pray consider the Evangels tell us IESVS was a Tôrâ observant rav. Same documents tells us IESVS never taught contrary to Tôrâ.
Would not the belief be Tôrâ obedience?
Ergo when examining the NT we ought not be passive consumers.
Christianity proclaims IESVS is a Second Temple rav. However, the NT textual claim does not concur with the practise.
Ought blame be upon those shepherds who feed on the fat of the flock?
We must separate belief from epistemic akrasia. Oft we count NT as authoritative.
However, one ought enquire whether such authority is from epistēmē. What value is a belief if not examined?
Be not deceived. Doxa is akin to iron pyrite whereas epistēmē is akin to a geode.