Tahajjud
Istighfar
Righteous friends
No porn
avoid sugar
drink water
hit the gym
Halal income
Hygiene
Talk less
PrayOnTime
= Magic pill to life. You’re ahead of 99% of people
Remember to pray a lot about 3 matters:
1. Ask Allah to make you think good of Allah at all times, regardless of your situation.
2. Pray about dying in a good state, upon the path of tawhid & Shahadah
3. Pray about your life in the grave & your condition on the day of qiyama.
May Allah make this friday beautiful for you, put barakah in your rizq, ease anything heavy on your heart, and answer the duas you’ve been quietly making. Aameen ya Rabb❤️🫶🏾
People who are willing to get married within 6 months of meeting actually take the marital commitment more seriously than people who insist on dating for multiple years before getting engaged.
The long-term daters have the attitude that they need to be in a relationship for years so they can see the all the negative aspects of the other person. They don't want to commit until they feel confident that the other person doesn't have any negative traits they haven't seen yet. What's the implication here? If their boyfriend or girlfriend does have issues that they didn't know about, then the marriage was a mistake. They'll more likely want a divorce if unforeseen character flaws do arise after marriage. They're trying to prevent this at all costs by dating for years before marriage.
Those who are willing to marry within 6 months are sending the opposite message: They may not be aware of every negative aspect of the person they're dating, but they'll make the commitment anyway. They're showing that they really are willing to stay together for better or worse. Imperfections might surface a few years into marriage, and that's okay. They're willing to accept that as part of marriage that they can deal with instead of viewing it as a dealbreaker.
Just my opinion, what do you think?
Women: God did not create us to live our lives in some company that doesn't even know our names and pays us overtime with pizza.
He created us for the most rewarding job in the world: being wives and mothers.
Feminists cannot defend 99% of the things they post when you put them on debates.
I sat and watched Candace Owens, Jordan Peterson, Charlie Kirk, Kevin Samuels dismantle feminists in debates and I realized…these women know NOTHING.
Zero. These are highly educated women with degrees sounding so foolish and childish.
They just repeat buzzwords. The moment you bring logic, cause and effect, economics, biology, real stats…they freeze. They start stuttering like idiots.
One dumb girl said men dominate STEM because of sexism and discrimination . Peterson looked at her and said…men dominate 99% of bricklayers, roofers, sewer
workers, jobs that will BREAK your back and KILL you. Is that discrimination too and Why aren't you fighting for equality there?
SILENCE.
That's when it clicked for me. Women don't want equality. That was NEVER the goal.
Equality is just the mask. What they want is DOMINANCE. They want men to have NOTHING. They want to dominate the top while men suffer at the bottom and they call that "progress." Then they have the audacity to say read a book.
Men are expected to approach women, tolerate rejection, absorb embarrassment and keep trying.
Then when he finally becomes successful, confident and selective, people suddenly call him arrogant.
Of course he's selective.
He spent years being told to improve himself.
He improved.
He built the career. Fixed his finances. Got in shape. Bought the house. Developed confidence. Learned emotional control.
And now you expect the man who worked to become valuable to have the exact same standards he had when he had nothing?
Growth is supposed to change your options.
That applies to men too.
There are a lot of social advantages that would come from having an all male workforce, with all women being dedicated to taking care of their homes and families.
Young children would all be raised by their mothers instead of having to go to daycare.
Grandmothers would be much more available to help with the grandkids because they'd have no job/career obligations taking up their time and attention.
The risk of infidelity would be much lower because men would always be surrounded by other men while at work, and housewives would be surrounded by other women in their neighborhood while the men are away at work.
Businesses would likely run much more efficiently because men are more geared towards competition, meritocracy, and accepting blunt criticism.
There'd be much less need for HR departments - men wouldn't have to worry about getting accused of sexual harassment by coworkers or tiptoeing around women's feelings.
With an all male workforce nobody would be able to get promoted based on their sex appeal or by "sleeping their way to the top".
With the labor force being reduced in size (since women all left the workforce) men's wages/salaries would be higher and it would be much easier for families to live off of one income.
Instead of meeting romantic partners through college or work, you'd likely be introduced through family members.
Fathers would have good relationships with other men through work, and could introduce good potential husbands to their daughters.
Mothers would have good relationships with other housewives and would know their children well, and could introduce good young women to their sons.
This would help young women avoid relationships with irresponsible men, and would help young men avoid relationships with women who aren't good wife material.