If you have witnessed potential election fraud, we want to hear from you.
People have been contacting our office wanting to provide information. We have established a dedicated email address for this purpose.
Email tips to: [email protected]
Please do not send rumors, theories, or second-hand information. We require direct evidence. Examples of what to report:
• A ballot arrived at your home for someone who has never lived there.
• You were told someone already voted in your name.
• You witnessed someone filling out ballots for others without their knowledge.
By the way, SB 73 (signed just last month) explicitly prevents any observer to challenge or re-verify signatures on the envelope.
There is literally no legal mechanism to audit, challenge, or even observe the signature verification process.
Stuff like this makes it very difficult for people to trust elections.
California has a serious problem.
Raman was in a distant third and now she’s leading every new drop to completely change the outcome. And there could obviously be legitimate explanations (esp since CA allows ballot harvesting, which is a problem in itself).. but no way anyone can look at them taking weeks to count ballot and outcome completely changing in one direction each time without having serious concerns.
@houmanhemmati@LACountyRRCC@spencerpratt@nithyavraman@SteveHiltonx San Diego ballot envelopes are even worse! Basically, as long as you scribble in both fields, it passes the strict “signature verification” process!
Funny how “Power of Attorney” is forbidden, but if you’re an anonymous person over the age of 18, we good! 🤔
#stopthesteal
🗳️ Many have been asking me describe the potential signature verification loophole for Los Angeles mail in ballots.
It says: “If a voter is unable to sign, the voter can make a mark witnessed by one person.”
Here, the person drew a happy face & “witnessed” it with a scribble. That scribble isn’t validated as being a real person. No name, nothing.
While a happy face may draw scrutiny, a plain line would not.
This could hypothetically enable mass harvesting where the voter never fills out, signs or even sees their own ballot.
We should be told how many ballots show up without the voter’s signature.
When Democrats act like it's unreasonable to expect the government to count votes in a day or two, how can they expect to convince voters to hand the government billions of dollars for other projects? Do we hold government to high standards or not?
So let’s me get this straight…
California, the home of hospice fraud, SNAP fraud, immigration fraud, and homelessness NGO fraud…
Is also a state with ZERO voter fraud.
Everything is fine. Nothing to see here, folks.
🤡