I was wondering about AI adoption in corporate and what were the actual blockers in it. I researched about in past few weeks, made a project to solve it!
Here are my findings -
https://t.co/wLSyDVjnAu
Open for reviews!
The bigger idea behind GhostProver is that AI systems should be able to say:
“we did not send regulated or sensitive data into this model”
and prove that claim with cryptography, while using 0G as the underlying verifiable compute, storage, and settlement layer.
We built GhostProver: a privacy-preserving compliance layer for AI workflows on the 0G stack.
Its job is simple:
“prove that an AI prompt did not contain sensitive data without revealing the prompt itself.”
Start reading how it is made and how does it work:
That means GhostProver can sit in front of AI systems and do 2 main things:
- block prompts that contain risky data
- generate cryptographic receipts for prompts that pass compliance checks
With 0G, those receipts can be independently verified instead of remaining internal logs
@0G_labs GhostProver is building on top of this Sealed Infrence to generate Cryptographic Receipts of non membership for compliance.
So, you now have Private Infrence + A proof that your prompt never contained any sensitive data. A much needed thing for institutions for compliance.
Every AI prompt your company sends is a trust exercise with no receipt.
You don't know if your vendor's model saw your Sensitive Information.
You can't prove it didn't.
Neither can they.
That's not a privacy problem. That's a liability problem.
🧵