krishna np

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@TheNavroopSingh Americanization.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@CKRaju14 Where cannons failed,canons won.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@svembu 3 is a metastable equilibrium.

[Sanatani Thakur 🇮🇳 @SanggitaT]

Through the Constitution, Congress turned India into a Muslim nation... but just didn’t declare it. (::)

Article 25, 28, 30 (1950)
HRCE Act (1951)
HCB MPL (1956)
Secularism (1975)
Minority Act (1992)
POW Act (1991)

Waqf Act (1995)
Ram Setu Affidavit (2007)
Saffron Flower (2009)

1) Through Article 25, they legalized religious conversion.

2) Through Article 28, they removed religious education from Hindus but allowed it for Muslims and Christians through Article 30.

3) Using the HRCE Act of 1951, they looted the funds of Hindu temples and sanctums.

4) Through the Hindu Code Bill, Divorce Act, and Dowry Law, they destroyed Hindu families, but did not touch the Muslim personal law. Polygamy was allowed, enabling them to increase their population.

5) In 1954, they brought the Special Marriage Act, making it easier for Muslim men to marry Hindu women (Love Jihad).

6) In 1975, during the Emergency, the word "Secularism" was forcefully inserted into the Constitution, officially making India a secular nation.
The attack on the nation's demography began with sterilizing Hindus.

7) Congress didn’t stop there. In 1991, they introduced the Minority Commission Act, declaring Muslims as a minority despite being large in number.
Even in a secular country where there should be no majority-minority distinction, Muslims were officially categorized as minorities.

8) Under the Minority Act, they gave Muslims special privileges like government scholarships.

9) In 1992, they legally stopped Hindus from reclaiming their temples through the Places of Worship Act, thereby taking over 40,000 Hindu temples.

10) Congress didn’t stop there. In 1954, 1964, 1995, and 2013, they amended the Waqf Act to give Muslims rights over any land and confiscate land from Hindus. Muslims became the second-largest landowners in India. (WAQF Bill)

11) In 2007, they submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court denying the existence of Lord Ram, and in 2009, Congress declared Hinduism as a terrorist religion by introducing the term “Saffron Terrorism.” This was the peak of their anti-Hindu crusade.

12) Interestingly, in its 136-year history, this Congress party has never identified terr,orism in burqas or triple talaq.

13) Congress systematically and skillfully deprived Hindus of their rights, slowly taking away everything from Hindus, yet Hindus are unaware of it.

14) Aurangzeb used the sword to destroy Hinduism; Congress used the Constitution, laws, and bills. Where the sword failed, the Constitution succeeded.

16) Then there is the media. If anyone tries to ask these questions, they are branded as communal, saffron, or a devotee.
If any politician tries to correct these wrongs, they are accused of weakening democracy.

17) Since 1950, Hindus have been electing Nehru and his family,

Do we still need this party that has betrayed Hindus so much?

[Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ @sankrant]

The West learned ice making from India. This eventually led to the science of refrigeration.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@total_woke_ Azadi from stipend is in order.

[Sridhar Vembu @svembu]

What can India do as we navigate this uncertain world order?

1. First things first, food security. Thankfully India is self-sufficient in food and we must safeguard our food security. As poorer nations face stress, India also must grow more food so we can aid other nations facing food crises. That is our dharma as Bharat.

This is what we did during Covid, with vaccine diplomacy.

2. Closely tied to food security is energy security. Today's agriculture converts fossil fuel to food, through dependence on fossil-fuel derived fertilizers and through tractors, harvesters and the like. Energy is food. Fortunately we have a good relationship with petroleum exporting nations.

Longer term, we need to foster R&D on more sustainable agriculture, from water management to holistic management of livestock and plants and electric powered farm machines. We also need a lot of model private farms and training centres.

3. We will face an onslaught of Chinese goods, from steel to toys to EVs and everything in between. What we think of as commercial aggression is really desperation in the face of massive overcapacity the Chinese have unwisely built. Navigating this will be a huge challenge.

Negotiating to pay for Chinese imports in rupees may be a good starting point. That may also push their companies to buy from us.

More generally, renegotiating to repay our external debts in rupees is a good idea and may boost our exports too. The world will likely be more receptive now.

4. Time to build factories. We need a 3-5 year sprint to build factories everywhere. We must push importers and distributors of imported goods to set up manufacturing units. The government can incentivise these - as an example, factories in backward districts can get 100% write off in one year and other areas can get 50% write off, to accelerate investment.

5. Related to the above, we must prioritize importing capital goods for production as opposed to consumer goods that we must aim to produce. And negotiate to pay for those capital goods in rupees as in 3.

6. We must aim to raise our R&D to GDP ratio to 3% over 5-10 years and this must happen mostly in the private sector. We need to push our private sector to set up R&D labs. Perhaps a CSR like obligation for R&D may work and we can also allow R&D related capital spending to be written off quickly.

7. India must liberally share the light of knowledge - gained from our R&D investment - with poorer nations. They do not have the vast human resources to invent that we do and when we start inventing, we must share rather than hoard. That is the only way to a more just and more stable global order. That is our dharma as Bharat 🙏

Thankfully we have a strong and resolute government and our Prime Minister Modi-ji is globally respected and those are huge assets as we chart a course through turbulent times.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@veejenair ഇതാണോ മുഖ്യൻ പറഞ്ഞ സുംബാ നൃത്തം?

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@svembu Oliver Heaviside the physicist used to say that the only asset class that the blockhead appreciates is money.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@CKRaju14 One good has come of it. It lends more credence to your calculus theft thesis. The progeny of the past collaborators have unwittingly managed to emulate their https://t.co/XhRkw1dJX0 one can be sure..

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

Mandabuddhi.

1. How many times do Purāṇas or Itihāsa show widows committing Sati after war?

2. After Mahābhārata, lakhs of men died — where’s the mass Sati?

3. Dasharatha’s wives lived on after his death — why no Sati?

4. Tārā and Mandodarī (wives of fallen warriors) remarried, with full respect — even blessed by Shri Rām.

5. If Mādrī committed Sati, why didn’t Kuntī, who lived decades after Pāṇḍu’s death?

6. Ask yourself — if Sati was mainstream, why don't even the exhaustive ritual manuals mention its steps?

These texts describe how to gulp water during a Yajña — surely they’d explain a widow-burning ritual if it existed in Dharma as an essential practice.

7. The word “Sati” means a woman committed to Satya.

8. Yes, there are rare stories of women dying on funeral pyres — often medieval, unverifiable, or miracle-soaked tales.

But this is either from:
a. Jauhar era post-Islamic invasions

b. symbolic language misread as literal

So no, there’s no Vedic ritual called Sati.

There’s only colonial distortion + victim-pimps trying to defend the lies forced upon them.

Vedas are about life, not death.

Break the spell. Or stay an illiterate mental servant enslaved by colonials who cannot read a word in Sanskrit but behaves like Manchurian Candidate.

[krishna np @giridharnp]

@PanickarS അപ്പോൾ വിദ്യാർത്ഥി സംഘടനയുടെ കാർമികത്വത്തിൽ ഉന്നത വിദ്യാഭ്യാസം തകർത്തു തരിപ്പണം ആക്കിയത് ഇതിനായിരുന്നു, അല്ലേ?

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

This article demolishes “Beef in Vedas” lie — a colonial fraud pushed by paid evangelists to break Hindu minds.

Enemy attacks are expected. Even welcome — that’s the Kshatriya’s domain.

What’s tragic?

When enslaved minds turn into loyal pimps, parroting enemy propaganda with pride.

Wake up. Break the chains.

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

https://t.co/J4ugNIN1PO

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

“There is beef in the Vedas” is not just a lie—it is a display of utter ignorance of the Vedic language system, Nirukta tradition, and dhatu-based interpretation.

1. My interpretations are based on Nirukta – the oldest surviving authoritative manual on decoding Vedic words.

Available version written by Yaska Muni, Nirukta is the foundational Vedanga text that explains the etymological roots (dhatus) of Vedic words. It’s not a commentary. It is the source code decoder of the Vedas themselves. No serious Vedic interpretation is valid without passing through this filter.

2. Nirukta is a Vedanga—not optional. It was designed as an essential tool to access Vedic meaning.

Any interpretation of Vedic mantras bypassing Nirukta is like trying to understand quantum mechanics without math.

If your reading of the Vedas does not conform to Nirukta’s etymological lens, you are not doing Vedic interpretation—you’re doing colonial fiction.

3. Nirukta decodes words by their roots—dhatus. For example:

Ashwa (horse) comes from root āśu = fast, dynamic. So Ashwa is anything fast—not just a 4-legged animal.

Gau (cow) comes from root gam = to move. Hence, in Nirukta, gau can mean light rays, Earth, speech, planets, even senses. Cow is only one derived sense—not the only one.

Agni is from ag = to move forward, lead—hence, Agni is not just fire but the guiding force of transformation.

Any “literal” reading that assumes gau = beef is pure garbage.

It ignores Vedic multi-layered semantics where one word maps to multiple planes—adhytamtic, social, psychological, elemental.

4. Sanskrit evolved from Vedic Sanskrit. Not the other way around.

Vedas were composed in a fluid, dhatu-rich language. Classical Sanskrit, with its rigid grammar and fixed meanings, came much later.

The Vedas are the parent, Classical Sanskrit is the child.

Reading Vedas in Classical Sanskrit lens is like reading quantum physics through class 3 book of arithmetic.

5. Even colonial evangelists knew Vedic Sanskrit was beyond their level.

They admitted in their internal correspondence that Vedic Sanskrit defies Western linguistic frameworks. Yet, they deliberately injected beef propaganda by twisting polysemic Vedic words into flat literal meanings—m��ṁsa = meat, gau = cow, vadh = kill—without any Nirukta backing.

What more, the translation doesn't even make any sense. For example:
They claim Rigveda (10/85/13) says, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”

Fact: The mantra states that in winter, the rays of sun get weakened and then get strong again in spring. The word used for sun-rays in ‘Go’ which also means cow and hence the mantra can also be translated by making ‘cow’ and not ‘sun-rays’ as the subject.

The word used for ‘weakened’ is ‘Hanyate’ which can also mean killing.

But if that be so, why would the mantra go further and state in next line (which is deliberately not translated) that in spring, they start regaining their original form.

How can a cow killed in winter regain its health in spring?

This amply proves how ignorant and biased communists malign Vedas.

The agenda was simple: break the civilizational spine of Bharat.

6. Nirukta itself obliterates the meat-in-yajna lie.

It gives Adhwara as a synonym for Yajna, and explains it as “that which is devoid of violence���.

Think about that. The very term Yajna is etymologically defined as non-violent.

Yajna = sacred inner offering

Adhwara = a path where no harm is done

There is no ambiguity. There is no space for violence.

Thus, the idea of killing cows in Yajna is not just wrong—it’s a complete inversion of Vedic Dharma.

7. The only version of Nirukta available to us is from Yaska, whose era predates Buddhism.

So the theory that vegetarianism in rituals was a Buddhist influence collapses.

Yaska’s Nirukta makes it clear: violence in Yajnas was never even a consideration.

It’s not opposed. It’s unthinkable.

If cow killing were part of Yajna, Nirukta would have detailed its process.

Instead, it gives zero space to such interpretations declaring Yajna as Adhwara - nonviolent at inception.

8. Most Nirukta examples are ritualistic. Yet nowhere does it prescribe or imply cow, bull, calf, or ox killing.

Why? Because such violence was not Vedic.

Even food was considered Yajna—“annam vai yajnaḥ”—and thus, it had to be pure, sattvic, and violence-free.

Anything involving pain, fear, or distress to a creature was anti-Yajna.

9. What later society did, or how people interpreted mantras without access to Nirukta or mastery over dhatus, is irrelevant to the Vedas.

You can’t retrofit errors of decline-era society into the original text and claim Vedas approved it.

That’s like blaming Dada Saheb Phalke for anti-Hindu trash that Salim-Javed wrote in Deewar.

10. The very first mantra of Yajurveda—“पशून् पाहि”—says:

“Protect the animals.”

Not exploit them. Not kill them. Not consume them. Protect them.

This is the source code of all rituals in Hinduism. If someone still sees beef in the Vedas, they’re either grossly incompetent or deliberately deceptive.

CONCLUSION:

📌 Gau ≠ beef
📌 Māṁsa ≠ meat
📌 Vadh ≠ slaughter
📌 Yajña ≠ violence

There is no beef in the Vedas. Only lazy minds and colonial leftovers project it there.

If you can’t read via Nirukta, you have no license to interpret the Vedas.

Let this sink in:

Vedas don’t need a defense. They need proper decoding. Read the roots, not the rot. 🔥

Join my Veda Sanskrit Masterclass to learn how to decode yourself. This also helps us fight illegal conversion and revive Sanatan Dharma on bhoomi.

🔗 https://t.co/Dgz40CwKdI

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

What a joke! Whose Vedic translation does western @grok refer to? Westerns of 19th century?

Why not refer to the oldest Vedanga text - Nirukta - that defines Yajna (ritual) as Adhwara where no violence must take place?

None of these mantras even remotely refer to any slaughter.

[Sanjeev Newar | सञ्जीव नेवर @SanjeevSanskrit]

The “cow slaughter in Vedas” lie is one of the laziest and most intellectually bankrupt distortions ever pushed. Here’s a breakdown of the 3 most cited mantras—(Rigveda 10.85.13, 10.86.14, 10.91.14)—to expose the linguistic fraud. Every single one crumbles when read with even basic dhatu and Nirukta clarity.

---

1. RV 10.85.13
Claim: Oxen are slain at weddings.
Reality: The mantra uses ukṣāṇaḥ and vadhitaṁ.

Ukṣan is from ukṣ = to sprinkle, nourish, energize—not a “bullock” to be butchered.

Vadhitaṁ comes from vadha, which in Vedic usage means restrain, subdue, silence—not slaughter.

Refer Nirukta - oldest texts on Vedic words and their meanings

Prati = toward.
One interpretation is a wedding ritual, symbolizing channeling inner vitality and restraining distractions. There is no ox, no slaughter, just metaphorical refinement of energy.

---

2. RV 10.86.14
Claim: Bullocks prepared for Indra with fat eaten.
Reality: Mantra says gavyāṁ sumāṁsam ābharā pavitre.

Gavyām = from gau = light, knowledge, speech, Earth—not necessarily “cow”.

Sumāṁsam = su + māṁsa = refined essence, nourishment, not flesh.

Pavitre = purifier—not cooking vessel but ritual purity or the inner space of consciousness.
Meaning: “Bring forth the nourishing essence of light into the purifier for Indra.”

Indra itself means one who causes rain of prosperity through dynamism. Aatmaa is also Indra.

No meat. No butchery. Purely symbolic offering of inner clarity.

---

3. RV 10.91.14
Claim: Barren cows are offered to Agni.
Reality: Uses anaduh śukram dhārayaṁsam.

Anaduh = that which does not nourish (not just “barren cow”)—can refer to old ideas, unproductive thoughts.

Juhutā = offer into Agni = symbolic burning of wasteful tendencies.

Śukraṁ dhārayaṁsam = sustaining brilliance.
Meaning: “Offer what no longer nourishes into the flame that carries brilliance.”
Again—no cow, no meat, no blood—only inner purification through fire.

---

Key Vedic Principle:
Veda mantras operate in layers of symbolic cognition. Words like gau, māṁsa, vadh, ukṣan have multi-layered meanings. Only a clown reads them literally.
Every Vedic yajña is a conscious refinement of prāṇa, vāk, and manas—not a barbecue.

The entire meat-in-Vedas narrative collapses under the weight of Sanskrit root logic and Nirukta. It’s time to stop parroting colonial-puranic debris and start reading Veda like a rishi, not like a recipe book.

---

Gau ≠ beef. Vadh ≠ butchery. Māṁsa ≠ meat. Rigveda ≠ steakhouse. Learn the dhatu or stay mute.

Join my Veda Sanskrit Masterclass to dismantle these lies yourself

https://t.co/Dgz40CwKdI

[Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ @sankrant]

The Chinese disparage their invaders, depict the cruelty of even the Japanese.

Their museums showcase ancient achievements. Their education is in Chinese.

Indians are taught to glorify invaders, mock their own language and culture.

Without deep roots no tree can grow tall.

[Prof. C. K. Raju @CKRaju14]

Sorry there was interference. The IIT Director in the audience ordered the live-stream to be shut down. Will share video when I get the link.

Full presentation online https://t.co/BmNO1I6qZS (pic). Some links may not work; pls let me know.

Click to run; don't download.

[The Emissary @TheEmissaryCo]

Lex asks Modi what unites India?

Modi answers in the exact way you would want a rooted Indian PM to answer:

Lord Ram, sacred rivers, ancient Gurus, holy pilgrimages, the idea of Aryavarta, and much more...