@0xfdf The same thing happens in trading: someone from a top shop can be very expensive to hire, but the chances that they understand something useful deeply enough are often low. The market has adverse selection
@Flomerboy Lead the meeting and really try to understand other people
I still write meeting logs manually to make sure I understand everyone correctly and keep everyone in sync
I don’t buy the game theory that you should never reveal full information
I was told I shouldn’t be saying some of the things I say
I believe radical honesty is important. Don’t say what you don’t believe. Be as honest as possible
That’s how trust is built. Being honest has never let me down so far
@iamKierraD Looks like a lot of bright young people happened to be around experienced people they could learn from, especially their beliefs and vision. That’s a huge unlock
Trusted abstractions with clear invariants is the fastest way to verify LLM output
Otherwise you get a slop report and have to second-guess every result until you review all the new code that produced it
Given that test time compute improves quality, it seems like a lot of math progress comes from some crazy harness, assuming labs use models similar to those available to general users: careful prompts, orchestration, best-of-k with a verifier, etc
Without that, agents don’t seem capable of making meaningful progress on difficult research problems
I wish someone would share a reproducible setup for solving a genuinely difficult math problem
@0xfdf When I read AI processed meeting logs, I wonder how LLMs manage to do a decent job at coding given how little they seem to understand about the business
@staysaasy I wonder if it’s a net positive strategy to feel that you are smarter than most people around you
The downside is that you might ignore genuinely good ideas from other people
I wonder how open weight model labs are going to make money or what drives them
My bet is that at some point there will be unique paid products around problems like continual learning
Extra points if continual learning doesn’t require sharing private data with a third party, e.g. through local inference