@redandblack President Morehead and the University deserve an apology from The Red and Black. This piece fails to meet the level of scrutiny and research that should be connected with this paper. https://t.co/u3aP8arUZZ
@caseyliss I think your response is intended to signal to me that you care not to have this discussion. I will respect that, along with your right to say it. Still love the show, philosophical differences notwithstanding.
@caseyliss So? What about gender? Is it fluid? Can’t people think that they are misgendered? Isn’t this a belief? Are you now saying it would be appropriate to curtail people’s beliefs or is that different because YOU don’t have a problem with it? Again, slippery slope.
@caseyliss Well, my comment was intended to be based on general notions of speech, but if you want to get “legal”, we can. Don’t you support fed gvt prohibition on discrimination? BBQ joints can’t deny service based on race. How’s it different to deny service based on ideas?
@caseyliss I understand the desire to stop people from saying hateful things but controlling speech is adjacent to controlling thoughts. Some of the greatest liberals were staunch defenders of people who said abhorrent things. You can stand up to mean people and the 1st Amd simultaneously.
@colecubelic@OhioStateFB Never said that they had. You posted video of Ohio State v. Arkansas St., video of the suckeyes beating up on last year’s worst team from the Sun Belt. What am I missing?
@atpfm I look forward to listening to an ATP episode where @marcoarment doesn’t complain about Apple being too greedy and keeping “developers” from making a bigger cut.