My silence has been intentional. I saw little reason to present my account in a landscape where allegiance is granted not to understanding, but to self-interest.
Such an immediate insistence on structural perfection, before the final articulation is even complete, exposes an overly dogmatic approach to dialogue. The failure here lies not within the unspoken content, but within the premature and unforgiving application of judgment.
It's interesting that you feel equipped to issue such a definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy of a narrative that, by all accounts, was not permitted to reach its necessary logical terminus.
Methodologically speaking, applying a standard of absolute judgment to an incomplete set of variables is not indicative of intellectual rigor; rather, it suggests an undue rigidity in evaluating discourse.
Ignorance is not a matter of lacking knowledge; it is the deliberate refusal to learn from what has been repeatedly explainedโฆ
โฆ and you insist on outrunning intelligence itself, as if even your own brain has given up trying to catch you.
The culture we have does not make people feel good about themselves. And you have to be strong enough to say, if the culture doesn't work, don't buy it.