@ksamuk@ZaminIqbal Thanks for advertising this. I ran into this last year and it's infuriating. Why they still claim to be outputting VCFs is baffling.
@vsbuffalo I don't think you need any actual training in philosophy to recognize that as nonsense, besides being wildly inaccurate as a summary of the field.
@NeightFSU@oliver_drk@nypost No, the Chinese could not have engineered the virus to protect their own. (Not to mention that their own weren't in fact protected.) In terms of human genetics, this is complete nonsense
@CentristAllWay @AlsoWonderWoman @lucky_number9_ @oliver_drk@nypost The virus has changed its binding to ACE2 repeatedly - it's the receptor binding domain that keeps changing between variants. There turn out to be many human variants that carry risk of disease, all populations have some, and the Chinese have shown no special immunity.
@loco_qf@WiringTheBrain I had one last night. I was using my phone to take video of the weird array of animals that had wandered into the room when I remembered that there is some kind of blob on the lens (which there is)
@JonathanMTweet@aylwyn_scally The common ancestor of mammals split into two branches. The issue is, which later animals come from those two branches. According to this study, one branch leads to comb jellies and the other to all other animals.
@JonathanMTweet@aylwyn_scally No. All living animals have been evolving for exactly the same length of time since the 1st animal. Some lineages do accumulate mutations faster, but that's not what's meant here. (By that measure, humans are closer to that first animal than mice, say.)